Tories vote against manifest promise on food Standards

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Farnham_Red, Oct 12, 2020.

  1. Dan

    DannyWilsonLovechild Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,574
    Likes Received:
    19,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley
    On the face of it I agree with you. However, consider this pandemic which just wasn't on peoples horizon at the last GE. It could easily have been (even be in) the tory manifesto to rule out taxpayer funding or subsidy of public transport.

    Things can change so fast as has been shown this year and 4-5 years is a very long time.

    I do however wish there was a way of ejecting a government for blatant lieing! Not of course that blatant liars would confess to that.
     
  2. wombwell-red

    wombwell-red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Messages:
    3,612
    Likes Received:
    5,315
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  3. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    No it doesn’t !, not legally anyway .
    No one is saying our treatment of live stock was perfect nor should the campaign stop to improve it ,
    But to say our standards are as low as USA or anywhere else for that matter is untrue .
    We have some if the best safeguards for transport and dispatch than almost every other country and if you think our legal standards are bad ,which I’m not arguing against by the way there’s always room for improvement and compassion , but to compare them with USA and most other countries for that matter is a million miles away .
    The treatment of poultry in USA is diabolical as is the pork farms over there and the cattle are injected with substances that are banned for humans in this country yet were expected to digest them for a trade deal .
    And on top of all this they said and promised. categorically that they wouldn’t t do it and they have blatantly **** on that promise and people still kiss their rses
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2020
  4. nezbfc

    nezbfc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Messages:
    10,990
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yes, my solution is probably too simplistic, understood that complications can arise, but yeah, we have to have some kind of system in place
     
  5. Hooky feller

    Hooky feller Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2016
    Messages:
    17,654
    Likes Received:
    20,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Retired, full time grandad.
    Location:
    Mapp.
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Obviously doesn’t read your posts. :)
     
  6. Fon

    Fonzie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    9,347
    Likes Received:
    15,961
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Don't blame him.
     
    Hooky feller likes this.
  7. blivy

    blivy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2011
    Messages:
    5,602
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The reasons it was rejected are set out here. I’ll now put my tin hat on for trying to answer your question.
    https://www.conservativehome.com/pl...astate-many-of-the-worlds-poorest-people.html
     
  8. Don

    Donny-Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,766
    Likes Received:
    7,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The thrust of that article being Is know we promised to uphold standards, but now we’ve considered the facts we realise it might be impossible’.

    so once more the issue seems to be; simple campaign slogan repeated parrot fashion is actually unrealistic.

    so now we’re in power we’re going to do whatever we like and won’t be held to scrutiny.

    We’re richer than you so that must mean we’re smart and you’re just gonna have to trust us to do the right thing.

    ok that seems reasonable :)
     
  9. troff

    troff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,693
    Likes Received:
    14,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    donny
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That whole article is a complete load of boll.ocks.

    The importing of bananas and tea had absolutely no impact on this decision whatsoever, it has everything to do with cosying up to the USA, and is yet another example of the shi.te they are prepared to peddle to justify their horrendous agenda.
     
  10. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,391
    Likes Received:
    23,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Not shooting the messanger but thats just drivel but thanks for posting their considered view. So to paraphrase what that says We hadnt a clue what we were promising when we wrote our Manifesto or gave voter assurances ( generous view) or we were lying and knew we were promising something we had no intention of delivering - more realistic view
     
  11. pin

    pingiskola Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    2,142
    Likes Received:
    574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    thank goodness for that !
     
    Fonzie likes this.
  12. pin

    pingiskola Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    2,142
    Likes Received:
    574
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)

    sadly i wont be...
     

Share This Page