But that would only make sense if I was saying Trump hasn’t been guilty of being emotional too wouldn’t it? And we all know he’s guilty of that, although not in the subject the discussion was about
Christ. Have a good evening Donald, I'll leave it there. Worthless debating with someone who's so blind that they cannot see.
But you used "too emotional" to discredit Nancy Pelosi, yet spent the entire thread defending Trump and Trump's supporters without mentioning how emotional he is.
To be fair there is some truth to that. It’s been well documented and discussed in a fair and open way by both sides and different media reports (as oppose to just Fox News). I haven’t seen it said as absolute fact, but it has been highlighted before. There was an investigation in to a Palm Springs hospital where of the 900 Covid deaths, actually only 174 were from Covid. Two separate columns on a document - one blanket filled with Covid. The other with actual cause of death.
I can see Trump is an idiot but so is Biden , if America can not come up with anyone better than these two,theres no hope, and I didn't think there was anything misogynistic about saying Nancy Pelosi is too emotional, look at her ripping up the papers in the senate to answer that
You’re stretching the truth a bit there mate. I haven’t spent the entire thread doing any of those things. And I haven’t defended anyone without also acknowledging negatives at the same time. Whilst also saying I think Biden will win. Why is it comments can’t be taken in silo? Talking about one specific issue and using ‘too emotional’ when there was never a need to use it elsewhere is vastly unfair. I can’t recall where I needed to talk about anyone else being too emotional in this particular thread.
oh well passed a hour on, sorry for putting DO, I left caps lock on and could not be bothered to edit it, no one can win arguing about this , as I say there both not worthy, but least Trump can speak
True but every Palm Springs there's figures being covered up and changed like in Flordia. What happens when politics takes over a major issue. Never thought I'd see the day when politicians would put self interest in front of public health. The Help Out to Eat out scheme report today mate to me is another example of trying to pass blame onto the public. The scheme was needed and I'm no fan of this government but that isn't what caused the spike. No one in my family got covid after being a pub restaurant. No one I know did and almost everyone I've spoken to said they've felt safer in those establishments than in the supermarket or at work. It's a chuffing mess
Yes he speaks, shame it's all lies and vitriol. We all have our opinions but I bet we can all agree on one thing. Our leading politicians home and abroad shouldn't be trusted to run a bath let alone a country.
True, but that change is just around testing rather than deaths. And to most it’s just bringing them in line with the official data as they weren’t originally counting tests on people who had already tested positive - meaning the testing number goes up and the positive tests percentage goes down. Makes the state more valid when in a ‘league table’. Everything else you said I 100% agree with.
well said, how on earth did they get in power,I can not name one who got in power, I thought he was the man or woman (dont want to be mysoginist),only one I rated was John Smith ,Labour's opinion poll lead was shown to be as high as 23 per cent in May 1994.sadly he died that very month
High ranking officer = very credible witness. See: “I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN “
Inequality like, Lebron james , Oprah, Lewis Hamilton, yada yada , give it up everyone likes a good stroking, it’s just people like you prefer a reach round , stop flying the flags of convicted felons and murderers
Means rank of person doesn't always mean instant credibility, you still need to provide hard evidence.
Like the emails, text messages and voice recordings that have been verified by the FBI sufficient for them to open a criminal case on the strength of them?
Not sure what you're getting at with the names you've cherry picked? Are you suggesting that racial inequality doesn't exist just because those 3 black people are successful?
Was it confirmed that Hunter Biden is under a criminal investigation. If not then he's not at this time. There's a major white collar investigation going on he may be implicated he also may not. REP senators have played along to such a point not denying child porn is on the laptop. Until indictments are served then he's innocent until proven guilty. The same can be said of Hilary's emails etc. Last time I checked the only government officials indicated and locked up were Trump people. Just saying.