Trump doesn't want to win the election because if they stopped counting votes Biden would be president.
There are some genuine questions to be answered on the way the mail voting has been handled and some of the numbers coming out of certain states. The problem is, those challenges are coming from the Trump camp which is emotionally unhinged at the best of times, so they don't get the credence they deserve (or maybe they don't deserve to some). Some of the rumours started in the last 24 hours are completely fake news, and the protests and chanting don't help the cause in the slightest, but if that was over here and in the Tories' favour a lot of people would be asking similar questions. Despite that, I don't think the challenges get a decision swayed in the supreme courts as they don't actually prove anything just suggest it as a possibility.
Just a suggestion but if they can’t prove it maybe it’s because there’s nothing to prove . Trump is wanting valid votes not to be counted in one state where it looks like he’s losing but ignoring it in another where he looks like he’s winning . There’s no suggestion of fraudulent votes just the timing of them being sent to counter centre , all of these votes have been time validated so it’s not the voters fault they havnt been submitted at the time Trump says they should despite his efforts to obstruct these himself from being submitted . Sore loser end of, there’s nothing fraudulent and his law suit isn’t about that because he’d lose before he’s even started . Bit late to Moan about the voting system when you’re losing in the middle of one when you’ve had four years to reform it but he was hoping it would go on his favour again .
Why would Trump want them to 'STOP THE COUNT!'? Perhaps he is throwing in the towel or perhaps he has evidence of serious voting fraud? Either way we will probably find out soon because I've heard there is going to be a major announcement from the Trump campaign at 3.30pm. Exciting eh?
Over the weekend, apparently... https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/donald-trump-stayed-loyal-piers-22953807.amp
Where did I say there was anything to prove? I don't know if you're deliberately talking to me like I'm arguing for something but I can assure you I'm not. There's definitely a case for them to look in to voter registration by county and electorate, just to put an end to some of the numbers coming out of certain places (e.g. 102% of an electorate registered to vote in one country). PA haven't managed the situation at all well, but you'll have that when it isn't a one country approach, and there are noises about back stamping late ballots, etc. which deserves to be heard if there's any substance. You've then got the facilities or invigilators or whatever they're called. If a Democrat state is found to have treated Republican vote watchers differently to Democrat ones in terms of their access to watching then that's another discussion that needs to be had. I'm not saying any of the above is 100% true and depending on the media you consume you'll likely have a certain view. But take away that the media will report it in the way that benefits them, there's things to be looked in to. My main point though was that regardless of all of this, these are only suggestions that it might have affected the recording of votes rather than proof that it did.
That's Trump though not Guiliani isn't it? Forgive me as I haven't read the link in full as newspaper websites annoy the hell out of me.
Stop the count and then destroy votes that have already been counted. I think that's the 'thinking' here.
Convince dems to vote by mail and then throw out all mail in ballots. It shouldn't work, but it probably will in that corrupt country.
Yes there is definitely no suggestion of fraud.... other than the whistleblowers, videos of counting centre fraud and Democrat votes received from dead voters. They could all be fake though I suppose (I haven't done any research to validate them). Either way, allegations of fraud have to be substantiated so if there isn't any fraud there won't be any proof that would stand up in the Supreme Court.
The interview was introduced by Vanessa Feltz and she pre lured with Piers & Trump had a big fallout resulting in Trump unfollowing him. Piers at some later date did an interview where he said if Trump wants to win he should contact him, which Piers claimed he did. The R2 interview was after the alluded to contact from Trump.
I didn't literally mean I thought he would ring him. I was taking the pi$$. Wasn't expecting to have to clarify that
They aren’t claiming fraud in the votes themselves from what I can gather from the odd Twitter allegation but when it comes to real litigation and putting accusations on the table it looks like they are citing valid ballots coming to the counting centres later than the closing window .