That is always a possibility. I don’t need to be a conspiracy theorist to believe that we live in a corrupt world and people at all levels can be bought. Like you say... we will have to see what happens.
Oh I have looked and debunked pretty much all of her claims. The point that a lot of people are making is that yes any crackpot OR perfectly sound intelligent person can make a claim and yes if that person is reputable they will rightly be investigated but a an allegation is simp!y that. It isn't proof of any cheating in itself.
The levels of fraud would have to on a wholesale scale, this doesn't happen, it's never happened. If recounts were conducted there may be a few hundred votes removed. That could benefit either candidate. Trump and his cronies are throwing out conspiracy theories hoping something might stick or to create chaos for President elect Biden. Basically Trump is crying like the little bitch he his. He'd rather the country burns because he's got to lash out and prove something. Reason why he should never have got involved in politics, his ego, mental wiring are all wrong. He's a narcissist who hasn't been fit from day 1, that's not my opinion its what many who worked for him and left have said. When the mass majority of high ranking generals concur you know there's something to it. My advice to you is stop trawling the internet for such conspiracy theories. All you'll find are cranks who have no actual evidence, who make wild links to nonsense. These people get paid for selling sh*t.
Dreamy must be loving this. There’s someone else posting fruitcake articles and then saying he only believes facts. it’s genius actually how bizarre it is.
Yes there is corruption in the world, but you have to actually prove it. If you view everything with suspicion then you'll drive yourself insane. People are always looking for the negative rather than seeing what's happening in front of their faces, no wonder the world is a head case. Wish folk would spend more time looking at the real injustices in our world rather than wasting time doing the dirty work for the actual bad actors.
What I meant by that analogy was that someone with a history of lying will not be believed regardless of whether they're right or not and trump's despicable history will work against him. It's the same reason why key information about a witness or defendant is kept secret from a jury Also I believe that when you are the one posting the claims on here then yes it is you who the debunking should be aimed at as you are spreading the false allegations.
Trump ‘joked’ only weeks ago that his supporters should vote more than once if they could. Trump has also admitted that in the past he’s been registered and voted in places he didn’t live. The whole electoral process is a joke.
I’m not spreading false allegations. I’m simply posting information about allegations made by the current US President which may prove to be true or false. Forgive me if I’m mistaken but I thought this was a discussion about the US election and everything I have posted has been about the election and the subsequent claims of fraud by one of the two presidential candidates. Nothing more, nothing less. I’m sure if site admin thought it was a pointless discussion they could easily close the thread down
Has anyone got to the bottom of Trump’s ‘water pipe bursting’ accusation? That one was a personal favourite.
Slightly off topic, but have you watched the documentary ‘The Plot Against the President’. If so, I would be interested to hear your thoughts on it
Yes he claimed that ‘In Georgia a pipe burst in a faraway location totally unrelated to the location of what was happening, and they stopped counting for four hours, and a lot of things happened.' In reality there was a leaking pipe in the room where mail in votes were being counted so they stopped counting for two hours while the leak was repaired. It didn't affect in person votes and simply delayed the counting of the absentee votes by a massive two hours.
Just remember that it's made by a former trump employee and long term ally so it's not exactly impartial