I want it tested on people who haven't read history, people who will have it this evening, people who will gladly suffer the side effects of a an untested genome pumped into their bloodstream rather than get a disease that won't hurt them. Seems I'm going to be well happy. Thank you.
Volunteers mentioning the side affects they have experienced even though for years to come you can say it's still early days (so what's later days going to be like in say ten years time) and Piers Morgan bringing up the treatment arguement that was debated on here the other day. We are supposedly a democracy so it would be evil to stop people from doing stuff if they don't take it. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/coronavirus-vaccine-volunteers-describe-severe-22986514
Long term it's probably not an issue but if we get into a weird crossover stage where many people are vaccinated and back to normal but non-vaccinated people have to maintain social distancing, ppe etc then those employees become more expensive and restrictive to keep for already struggling businesses in a recession. If you had to make a choice as to which player to make redundant which would you go for?
I would imagine there are many people who are desperate to take an untried and untested drug who will be filing claims when it turns out it's fk*ced them up. Actually, I wouldn't imagine, I already know.
I love the fact people are complaining about taking a vaccine designed by scientists from all around the world but they will take Coke from a dealer called Kev who has two front teeth and 26 children.
I kind of understand what you're saying, but the example you're giving will be years down the line imho. Your other question: if I really really had to make someone redundant then I would chose to keep the person who was best at their job
**** me, some crazies on here tonight, soon as my pension comes in, I'm buying me boat and tapping out from civilisation as it currently is. Just need the pharmaceuticals to start really performing to bump that £ up.
Who are these people? I say this as someone who has never had cocaine in his life. I'm one of the people who is questioning this vaccine, are you aiming this at me?
12 years ago a drug to stop Alzheimer's went into phase 3 trials with 3000 people started. It wasn't until Two and a half years later that they realised it was causing cancer and abandoned it. They've only been testing this for a few months...
They aren't the only alternatives though, they're simply the only options people en mass are willing to accept
I wonder if anyone has ever smuggled coke inside coke cans. That would be ballsy So what have you got in the van then? Oh just a pallet of coke Ah ok fair enough, on your way mate
I'm 65, so it's not necessarily trivial for me if I get it. But you're entitled to your opinion of course. My opinion is that I'm happy to risk it.
You're probably right. To be clear I don't condone any such behaviour. I'm just musing. People are discussing the morality of governments but there are plenty of immoral businesses out there eg Ryanair.. That Michael O'Leary ***** would fire anyone who threatened his profit margins
If I was 65/70+ I might go for it, as the issues of long term effects are a bit less relevant and covid is more dangerous. But as a healthy bloke in my early 30s they can ********.
Or that my body knows what it is dealing with and has some antibodies against it. I’m more than happy to take my chances. I’m also more than happy for you to be the BBS guinea pig if you are desperate to get that jab. The fact that the army have been rolled out in Liverpool schools to administer Covid tests suggests to me that they aren’t planning to make this optional though.