The Daily Heil are having a go at Marcus Rashford for daring to take on the Tory Party and stick up for hungry kids . I’m not posting a link to that splashfart of a Rag but they’ve probably promised Boris and co they’d get even .
Here’s the Independents view of it , liking Gary Linekers view of the sh it rag . https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....ashford-daily-mail-property-b1723220.html?amp
Gary Lineker is spot on. I wonder if they'd have run the story had Mason Mount done what Marcus had done? I doubt it very much.
If i was as rich as rashford is now, thats exactly what id do with my brass. I would also like to think id try to change things for the better for others as he has. Good on him and **** mps
I believe they would tbh because he’s dared to take on the Tory’s , but in Marcus case it’s double top for the the dirty lousy scum of a rag .
Perhaps, but the colour of his skin makes him a target in the same way it did for Raheem Sterling. The right wing apologists for such filth will then plead innocence!
The shjtrag even turned off un moderated comments too. They knew exactly what sort of article they were publishing the absolute set of lovely people
Perhaps before rubbishing an outstanding young man, they should talk about their owners - those patriots who pay no tax here (allegedly) - shameful, truly shameful!
Pathetic and disgraceful behaviour which unfortunately is all too predictable. I'm sure there are plenty of uneducated folk eating up the lazy racist nonsense.
Wealthy articulate man with access to the best financial advice money can buy to reduce Tax liabilities uses the same to make investments that provide a solid long term ROI. Cant see what all the fuss is about.
Maybe the daily mail should be more concerned about boris and his pals still getting a food allowance each day which they do not need but voting against children who get free school dinners having them in the holidays. The rashford article is a non starter he can spend his money on whatever he likes.
unfortunately the numbskulls will read it and legitimize the inherent racism contained within them selves and the article. it simply would have not been written if a middle class white person had spearheaded the same campaign.
I think class is the biggest thing here. It’s the fact he is working class. Let’s be realistic, if someone like Jack Grealish did this he’d get similar treatment. Systemic racism is embedded in our society, which is absolutely shocking and needs stamping out, but let’s not pretend class inequality isn’t a massive issue, across all races.
With papers like the daily mail it's definitely both. Class and racism. Because rashford is black AND has dared to have a go at the Tories he becomes a prime target.
Yeah, that’s fair actually. Just pointing out class is also a massive issue. The fact he is black is the icing on the cake.
this It’s much more complex than race, but that doesn’t mean race doesn’t play a massive part. Sterling vilified for being good and unapologetically black, Rooney not particularly popular, but Beckham a god. Class, race, attitude, looks, the Mail and its readership have a very judgemental view of the world.
Beckham’s face fit. Race is a massive issue, but the fact people ignore class and class inequality in the debate irks me slightly.
Of course I do. Its a good old fashioned hatchet job. Albeit poorly executed one which lacked any substance other than man invests in houses. There's a distinct lack of quality investigative journalism these days. Its part of the course, if you stick your head above the parapet, expect someone to take a pot shot.
