Tee hee. Let me give you the answers. Just in a spirit of friendship should you ever post anything about football. No honestly, I don’t mind. After all ‘we’re all in it together.” The answers are: Question 1. Sheffield Wednesday. Question 2. Red. HTH
He’s never even commented in a thread about football. This one and the vaccinations post. That’s it. I’ve bowed out of this thread. It wouldn’t be 80+ pages long if it wasn’t for him being a whopper.
You are a card, Dalestykes! Too funny. Are there more than one of you by the way or are you a gender non binary like Sam Smith who expects people to refer to them by the pronouns they and them. If you want to test my Barnsley FC credentials perhaps you could throw me a few more difficult ones.
Random waffle in a thread entitled US politics doesn't count no matter how many players names you used to try to prove a point
I thought everyone had gone mad until I realised I had got Casual Tyke on ignore. Shields up again and the world seems lovely.
Where was that posted - Just done a quick search on all your posts in the last week and all but 2 were in this US elections thread. The other 2 were in the compulsory vaccinations thread - neither seem to be much about football
If that is random waffle.... then 99.9% of the football posts on the board are. What do you suggest I should talk about for it not to be waffle if that’s what you consider comment on our defence, midfield, strike force and management team to be? The kit man and canteen staff perhaps?
Hmm! That's rather touching faith in Trump's cunning! What say ye about the Electoral College tomorrow, Mr CT? How d'ya reckon that one's going to play out?
Perhaps you could try engaging in football threads on this football forum? It's random waffle because it was simply to prove a point. It had no context, no relevance, nothing. It was simply you posting in your political thread to prove a point and as such it was waffle. If you want people to take you seriously as a Barnsley fan post in football related threads.
It was in this thread. Apologies if posting about football in the US Election thread violates forum rules. I will choose a more appropriate thread next time.
IIRC there has been once case of fraud found to be proven and over 50 cases thrown out by various courts due to lack of evidence so our WUM is going to have to do a better job than Trumps legal team
I’m not sure how it will play out Mr Orsenkaht out but I will certainly be following the developments with interest. Do you not find it a little odd that only a matter of weeks ago people were saying that Barr was in Trumps pocket and acting like his personal prosecutor and now Trump has cast him as the pantomime villain?
IIRC the case that the republicans ‘won’ wasn’t an allegation of fraud, but a case where the Republican poll watchers were moved ‘too far’ out of the way, which was found to be illegal, however the poll watchers had been moved because they were getting in the way of the counting, so they were told to watch their behaviour too.
I actually object to the use of the term WUM which implies that I only post to wind people up. Just because I hold an alternative viewpoint to the majority doesn’t make me a WUM, does it? In fairness I will admit that I have taken a few light-hearted swipes at people but only those who have chosen to goad me in the first instance. I find it really interesting how the more ‘liberal’ members of this board are the ones who are by far the least tolerant of anyone who holds a differing opinion. Isn’t that more ‘fascist’ than ‘liberal’?