I'm actually a bit of all three Donny.... I'm a comic genius who has absolutely no interest in politics but enjoys 'owning the libtards' (well.... perhaps more winding up than owning to be fair).
I'm not sure how you can be a 'victim' of blackmail relating to the alleged rape and murder of children without also being a 'perpetrator' of said rape and murder. That is certainly the implication I take from the tweet but perhaps you see a different slant. Let's put it this way.... if I was Supreme Court Justice John Roberts and Lin Wood had put that tweet out about me and I knew my conscience was clean, I would certainly be banging in a libel claim.
Go on; tell us whether you actually believe any of the QAnon nonsense you keep quoting. You appear to defend it quite aggressively, but I can’t believe you’re that stupid.
Aggressively defended? I can assure you that there hasn't been a single message that I have typed on this thread without a smile on my face Donny. No aggression at all. If you can quote any of my posts where I sound aggressive I may stand corrected though. And what 'QAnon nonsense' have I 'quoted' out of interest? I simply copied and pasted some quotes from Lin Wood's twitter feed because I thought that you would find them amusing. I then suggested that what he was saying about Justice John Roberts in those tweets appeared to me to be tantamount to libel (although as Mansfield pointed out I incorrectly wrote 'slander' in error - see I'm not always right). This was simply a commentary on what Lin Wood said rather than any kind of defence of him.
From where us ‘free thinking liberals’ are viewing this; the sources you’re quoting definitely fall into the description of QAnon nonsense. If you honestly, sincerely believe them to be true, I really am concerned for you. Seriously.
Surely you know all the sources you’ve quoted. have a look at them, see what else they’ve posted, make your own mind up. I did
I'm not sure I've quoted anything from anywhere. If you want to refer me back to any specific posts I've made though I would be interested to see them.
Are you really saying you’re not sure you’ve quoted anything, in the post following the one where you’ve named someone you quoted? And on the same day you’ve quoted at least one other person? OK, that seems reasonable. Are there a team of you?
No, he categorically denied being a WUM early on in the thread, then went on to not only admit it was all a wind-up after all, but declared his intention to continue winding people up, long beyond the ‘interesting day’ on Wednesday. It would be awful if someone were to report this now self-confessed WUM to site admin, eh readers?
I know it goes against your nature but stop being a bellend Micky. My purpose of being on this thread is simply to discuss the US election. Winding up narrow-minded people such as yourself Is simply an inevitable side-product of holding an alternate viewpoint and, to be honest, watching you lose your **** and going off on expletive-laden rants is quite amusing. Besides, you are going to love the final punchline and you really wouldn’t want to miss out on that, would you? It’s going to be an absolute corker!
You can certainly move on Peachy.... the door’s just over there. Please close it on your way out. There’s a good chap.
But you keep telling us you don’t have a viewpoint. you’re either suffering from a multiple personality disorder, or you just post any old Bol lox hoping we forget what you previously posted.