I thought it was just me , thanks ST , I am not on my own as I do not have a clue what the OP is on about , I know I am not the smartest but can someone please explain what on earth does the opening post mean ?
Yes but you then asked why why her inclusion should even be a thing we thnk about yet you were one thinking about and talking about her
"it is just the inclusive world we live in now,for me It’s a farce but the way it is" Direct quote from yourself. Maybe you didn't mean it like this, but you're calling an inclusive world a farce there.
You guys should be lawyers,I was explaining it’s the inclusive world we live in to opening poster,then had moved on in my brain to saying it’s a farce that it’s even something he should question just I get ahead of myself typing ,you would have me done up like a kipper,sometimes your all very clever with words
Hazel makes it look effortless doesn't she. I'm sure she was just nervous as say its clear now she is upto the job. I've been interviewed a few times for TV documentaries through work and i can only imagine how overwhelming it could be doing it live. Then the extra "judgement" that comes from being a woman on TV.
A women on tv or a women doing sport,the lady who was main person earlier was very good,infact all the new presenters have been good even ones in pyjamas
Nowt to do with the sex of the anchors, there’s good and bad in both sexes, otherwise how do you explain Ian bloody Wright!
It’s Roy Keane I struggle with. He just seems to dislike people. He doesn’t engage with neither his viewing audience or his studio colleagues. Without doubt he knows his football, but he is very unengaging for me. Falls into the Mark Lawrenson bracket, also, as an unsuccessful football manager who sits in a studio saying what a successful manager should be doing or should have done.
Roy Keane is popular with a certain demographic for the same reason that bozo and trump are. He's aggressive and goes on a rant which people misconstrue as passion