£100million, plus a player. The fans of ESL giants Tottenham will be moaning that their club is a mere stepping stone - which it is.
I think it was about £50million. Ci'eh generally don't pay top whack for players* - they'd sooner have 3 x £50million players, than one who cost £150million. *Ummm, until now, anyway.
Im not a City fan but I would imagine they would be greatly insulted being compared to the tripe I witnessed on Friday night.
We had the Kane discussion in pub other day. There was only me who rated him. I was astonished with the haters. He's like Woodrow for comparison in our level. Just not designed to play like that. Blame managers not the player. It's like asking Stones to play left wing. Stick him in and around 12 yard box and its proven Kane will get 25+ PL goals a season. £100 million is a steal at today's prices.
Bloke got 23 goals and 14 assists in a mediocre Spurs side. Anyone who thinks he wouldn't fit in a Guardiola team is on glue - his link play and ability and willingness to drop a bit deeper make him a perfect fit.