Which we've all known he has since before you tried defending him. Mainly on account of the photographic evidence in his workplace
They’re both at work in a public building whilst having it off. She’s being paid a grand a day to stand there snogging his face off.
Not trying to defend him, keep saying that.. They could put him on a bus and leave him in the middle of Grimethorpe for me , they do bonfire night well..
Specifically employs a woman just so he gets uninterrupted and (supposedly) private access to her bits and bobs. I'm proper chuffed my tax money is funding that rather than contributing to a Sure Start centre or paying for FGM support for a suicidal girl.
So you don’t accept that the ‘hanky panky’ with her in ‘worktime’ and on ‘work premises’ is not intrinsically linked to his role as Health Secretary, and that he should be sacked for all the other ‘failings’ in his role as Home Secretary. Jeez,
No again, misinterpretation of the post... I said go after him on his failings as Health Secretary rather than this affair. It's already getting brushed off as personal by the government snd they will keep brushing it under the carpet until they think the focus has gone off the PM, then he will announce a cabinet re-shuffle and Hancock is nowhere to be seen. they can't say that about the decisions he made. So pursue him on that side of things. Marlon hit the nail on the head. Sacrificial lamb, all attention getting diverted onto an affair rather than preventing needless deaths.
And the longer people excuse it as is personal life the longer it drags on and the longer attention is diverted
Exactly my point. People more in uproar about him in these circumstances, the real big picture is being diluted and washed away.
You're missing the point. He's broke social distancing rules and guidance that HE forced on the nation. He's done that in his paid public servant employment. For that he has to go and it should be immediate. Instead there are people such as you saying oh no this is a personal matter, he shouldn't go for this, we should concentrate on other stuff. He should have GONE for other stuff a long time ago but he didn't and the opportunity to get shut is now because of this. By defending it as personal and therefore irrelevant is to drag it on
One of the few following the rules?? Everyone I know has followed them. That’s what makes me so angry about this Handcock scandal. I also get angry at the suggestion that, in general, people have not followed the rules. Particularly when it is used to excuse the criminal negligence of those in power.