Why are you trying to turn my reply into something it isn't?' i'm just saying that i think its an act' some people absolutely love stirring the pot..
I'm not sure it matters if she believes it or not. If she spouts that kind of hatred then she deserves to have her platform removed whatever her 'real' intentions are. What she spouts is the same stuff Jo Cox's murderer believed. It's hardly comparable to Ramsey or Cowell
"she's constantly keeping herself in the public eye' very astute lady i think' just giving the public what they want and getting very wealthy doing it.." Sorry, but that sounds like praise to me.
We’ll agree she loves to stir the pot, but I strongly disagree that she doesn’t believe what she says. She wouldn’t have gone to court at the risk of bankruptcy if she wasn’t 100% behind the nasty stuff she says. She’s not at all bright and earning loads of money, she’s the opposite; a vile gobshite who’s overstepped the mark enough times to not only reduce her earning potential (sacked by all who employed her to be controversial), but lost her home in an unwinnable court case rather than apologise and pay £50 to a refugee charity.
Is she not keeping herself in the public eye? i'm not praising her at all 'as a human being she is obviously morally bankrupt but the fact that she's made a million tells you that she has her head screwed on business wise' the fact that we are talking about her on here and the reactions she's getting is proof that her business plan works for her..
Maybe you should have put in your original comment that you think she's morally bankrupt, instead of listing her apparent successes and comparing her to people that aren't racist sewer dwellers.
Maybe i should but the original comment was based purely on her business sense and i wasn't comparing her to ramsay and cowell as such' just pointing out that like them she's created a persona' a vile one but a persona all the same..
She might have made a million, but lost most of it on the court case when she had to sell her house to settle and was living in rented property at the time. That was late 2019.
Either you have me on ignore; or you’re so impressed at your own opinions that you’ve refused to accept the evidence to the contrary. If she was astute, she wouldn’t have to travel all the way to Australia for media attention. She’d still be living in her own home, with several high paid jobs in the media. But she’s not astute, she’s stupid enough to have got the sack from those decent paying jobs, and to now be living in rented accommodation die to the £100s of thousands of debt for legal fees she brought about due to her stupidity. When people are happy to pay you good money to be ‘controversial’, it’s astute to keep taking that money by staying the right side of being vile. So we can agree she’s morally bankrupt; can we now also agree that she’s not even close to astute. She’s a thick racist bitch.
No! Why do you think she’s in Australia, or was deported from South Africa, it’s because she no longer gets media attention here.
I met her in a work context before she became a professional gobshite, I can confirm that she is 100% **** and it's not a character.
It's becoming quite common for anyone to get banned for having opposing views of the perceived wisdom of the day . https://nypost.com/2021/05/28/twitter-wont-confirm-users-can-post-about-covid-lab-leak-theory/ We only have to look at the COVID " lab leak " theory . Would have got you banned on twitter right up to the moment the powers that be decided that it could be a distinct possibility . Then there's Julian assange locked up in belmarsh for revealing US war crimes . Censorship is a dangerous game . Great when it's someone you hate , not so great when they come for someone with legitimate points of view that our oligarchy find inappropriate to themselves .