Schopp for the Chop poll v 2.0

There is the 80% mob closely followed by the 20% mob for selling well actually giving the 80% mob control of OUR club. The manager is merely a symptom of a rotten club that's rotting from the top down.

 

well we know Loko is online but who are the other 2?

 

Schopp, Conway and El-Ahmad

 

Dogs allowed to vote in BBS polls but we can’t have dog turnstiles, never fair!

 

Last 2 probably wouldn’t surprise me tbf.

 

He needs to go, I can't see how we could possibly stay up with him in charge

 

There’s a ’change your vote’ button for that scenario anyway.

 

I’ve changed from a no to a yes. I was all in favour of giving him more time, especially with Mads to come back and the two Belgian lads needing to get up to speed, but we are now in such a mess that it really is going to need a new voice and better organisation to sort us out. Will say I’m also not without sympathy to his situation as a number of things have seemed to conspire against him......backroom staff, injures, visas etc.

 

Is there a genuine possibility of a managerial change or is it a closed Schopp?

N.B. Sorry, but I can't think of anything else to comment on apart from making weak puns

 

I’m not going again while he’s”in charge”. I wonder when that will be?

 

Think we’ve got beyond the point of giving him time.

 

Are there really eight people who genuinely think he warrants more time?

 

All anonymous? Would be interesting to hear their reasoning?

 

Right who are the 11 wums then because nobody in their right mind still wants that Muppet to still be our Head Coach surely, unless they are just seeking to wind the rest of us up

 

My cavapoo has weird thoughts at times.

 

I think he should walk. I don't think he should be sacked.

I'm one of the 'no' voters.

 

Well obvs every single one of us agrees he should walk, but it's not going to happen, so therefore he should be sacked. So are u saying u would keep him indefinitely until he walks, the owners should never sack him, leave him to "manage" us in L1? Is there any level of performance that u would concede means he should be sacked? One win in 16 games, 7 straight defeats........is for instance..... 10 straight defeats enough? I'm struggling to understand not wanting him sacked. Or are u being pedantic about the wording of the poll?

 

That is mind boggling.

We’d all love him to walk - but it’s absolute madness to think he will and that a sensible option is to not sack him and wait for that to happen, surely?

 

There are now eleven no voters, we’ve seen one explanation, which ok I think is flawed but I at least get it.

The other ten though? As someone has eluded to, it’s got to be some comedians on a wind up. If not, please, what is the thinking? Is there genuinely anyone who thinks he shouldn’t be removed from the role - be that by being sacked or him falling on his sword?