But if the poster can't get the basic geography of the place right, how can you trust anything else they say about it?
A lad I work with nearly died after having the jab due to a side effect which enlarged his heart, he now has life long issues from his voice changing to having scarring on his heart and diaphragm. So yeah I can see why people are wary of having the jab
So regardless of the status of someone (age, health, creed etc) every single person in the world loses antibodies at the same speed and every single person needs yet another jab after six months no questions asked without being offered an antibody test first to see if someone really needs it. Billions around the world haven't had one life saving jab and we are already on to a third when people will have a high level of protection from two jabs and the likelyhood that most people have knowingly or unknowingly had covid.
Are you really arguing against a study published in the Lancet, based purely on your guesses, gut feelings and straw man arguments?
Me and Laura had our booster this morning. Fully vaccinated now. We'd both been putting it off but heard about possibility of pass ports coming in properly. Thought might as well get it over with.
No I am saying it's wrong we are on to giving people third jabs who may or may not have an high level of protection (we just assume nobody does without finding out first) when billions in other countries are at high risk from not being offered one jab yet.
It's laughable how you bounce from one viewpoint to another. If we had a huge spike in cases and had to lock down for weeks on end to reduce NHS pressures because immunity from the vaccines had waned, you'd be whingeing that we didn't secure boosters quick enough and talking about the impact on the economy against the price of vaccines. Literally impossible to please you. I suggest you find another hobby instead of being obsessed with this 24/7.
I said this about a year ago I think but dreamboy appears to easily swayed by the last thing he read. Unfortunately, a lot of what he reads is from really **** sources.
Where did I say any of that? You asked "where it was clear" about efficacy waning and the benefits of a third jab. I pointed you to just one of the studies coming from Israel. One of the issues that has effected efficacy is the Delta variant. A good chunk of our population have had the Astra Zenica jab and the pfizer now being offered as a third jab offers better protection against delta. If there is a big advantage to the population having a third jab which means the number of people ending up in hospital and intensive care can be reduced it seems like a good thing from my point of view. I think people have the right to choose but there are too many idiots who think this is a conspiracy by big pharma which boils down to ignorance. My viewpoint might be skewed. My lungs work at 50% capacity of someone of my age and my kidneys about 25% due to vasculitis so Im really trying to avoid getting Covid as the outcome could be pretty final from my point of view so I dont think twice about a 3rd booster and had it as soon as it was offered. To answer your question about an antibody test. I suspect the answer has a few strands. The first is that anti-bodies are not the only aspect of immunity. You might not have antibodies but still have immunity based on your T-Cell/ memory cells that would then generate anti-bodies but I don't thin there's a way of testing for this. Secondly is the logistics. Setting up the infrastructure for all the vaccination centres has been a large and expensive undertaking. Setting up similar infrastructure to do that many anti-body tests would be a lot more costly and there isnt the lab capacity or expertise to put that level of testing in place in the UK never mind in the poorer countries. And then there's cost. The antibody tests are more expensive than the actual vaccine. If you are worried though you can always get yourself an antibody test for Boots or Lloyds or online.
All the data points to the vaccines working. Seems to me having a booster is a very sensible precaution as we head into winter. Some people may not need it some will, but I imagine it's just easier and quicker to give it to everyone in those groups.
This is a fantastic reply, Gally, and a template we can all try and learn from. You acknowledged your own bias, offered factual, non condescending information to address the opposing viewpoint and finished with offering useful and practical advice based on the desires of the poster you were replying to.
It's been less easy to get Boosters than it was for jabs one and two. My parents live in Wath and got jabs one and two by walking to a local hall. I had to take them to Rotherham town centre late at night for their booster. The mother-in-law had jabs one and two at her strictly socially distanced GP surgery, but has to go to a Boots presumably full of shoppers for the booster. I do wonder how other people in their 70s and 80s without access to their own or a family vehicle have managed. I'm booked in at Priory Campus rather than somewhere in my home village as well. The flu rollout hasn't helped, but what happened to getting flu and Covid jabs at the same time?
The jabs do not last for ever that is why you have to have another every 6 months or whatever like having the flu jab every year. I presume eventually they may get one that lasts a lifetime
That is an extremely odd way of presenting that data and, frankly, very misleading. It completely ignores how unlikely you are to be hospitalised if you're already double vaccinated. Another way to present the data which does not: There were 728,321 individuals in each group. The first group were double vaccinated, the second group had a third booster vaccination. In the first group 231 individuals were admitted to hospital during the study. 0.03171% of the group. So, to make the same claims as this paper, being double vaccinated is 99.968% effective at keeping you out of hospital. In the second group 29 individuals were admitted to hospital. 0.00398% of the group. So, again to make the same claim as this paper, being triple vaccinated is 99.996% effective at keeping you out of hospital. A change in effectiveness up from 99.968% to 99.996% is, as the claim, an increase in effectiveness of 90+%, but 90% of next to nothing is still next to nothing. By all means, get the booster, I wouldn't attempt to argue anyone against it, but although the maths in this study adds up, it doesn't tell the story people think it does.