Just finished watching the 'Get Back' film. Dragged on a bit, as does anything from Peter Jackson, but fascinating nonetheless. The Lennon/McCartney dynamic gets covered quite a bit, which got me thinking. They had a well documented beef for years, and McCartney has always felt a bit aggrieved that he didn't get the recognition he deserved. As a massive Beatles fan I realise I'd get shot down for saying this - but I genuinely believe McCartney's body of work post-Beatles is bang average. So here's the quiz question... Does any of McCartney's solo work match the best 20 songs from John Lennon's solo work? Beyond 'Maybe I'm Amazed' and 'Junk', I'm really struggling to find any. Go...
As solo artists I just don't think Macca touches John's greatness. I haven't properly delved into McCartney solo/Wings, but the bits I have heard haven't been worth listening to (although my dad really rates McCartney's latest album, McCartney III?). Lennon was on another plain.
I tend to agree, it's all down to taste obviously but I thought the Wings stuff was garbage in the main.
I did spend some time going through the solo and wings stuff. generally found the odd good song, but not much more than that.
They were better together. I never skip a track when listening to a Beatles album (apart from number 9, number 9, number 9). I do skip tracks listening to them solo.
plastic ono band is a great example. first proper solo release after the split (I'm ignoring the experimental two virgins/wedding album stuff) is outstanding. exactly what I'd expect from someone who was still writing Beatles songs at the time. McCartney I by contrast, is really poor. It's almost like he just immediately forgot how to write songs. The most scathing line from Lennon (How Do You Sleep?): "The only thing you done was Yesterday, and since you're gone it's Just Another Day"
When John Lennon was with Mai Pang him and McCartney reconciled. However, he got back with Yoko and the rest is history.
I'd agree with many of the above comments, particularly SD's. In the massive body of work that McCartney had done since the Beatles he has sometimes done some good stuff imo. Band On The Run has got some good tracks on it for example...
I think you'll find that a lot of people share that opinion. McCartney's solo stuff does have its great moments - he has always known how to write those beautiful melodies, but then on the next track he goes all granny rock again. Ram is a great album though, and McCartney I, II & III are all pretty good. Most other albums have the odd great track, a few decent ones, and a couple of real stinkers. I respect him as a musician though. But like @Stephen Dawson said above, Lennon and McCartney were better together. Lennon's solo career is quite hit and miss as well. He was capable of writing some great and unique songs, but there's some absolute garbage too.
yeah I think that's what I mean really. it's 'ok' but not much more. there isn't a single McCartney solo/wings album I'd buy. by contrast, plastic ono band & imagine are both excellent, and while the other Lennon solo albums aren't as good, there's excellent songs on every one (I'm not including live/cover albums).
which is interesting, cos on Get Back McCartney comes across as a bit of a tyrant, while John seems quite passive through it all. I think by this time though it was probably a case of 'I can't be ar$ed arguing'
Although he was far less prolific than Lennon and McCartney, in my opinion the consistency and originality of George Harrison's output is something quite incredible.