Efl players refused to have vac

I'm not sure where you are getting your numbers from, but 2020 had the most excess deaths since 1918, at the height of the Spanish Influenza epidemic.

In the last week in November this year, the figures for deaths were 10.5% higher than the 5 year average (and that 5 year average includes 2020 which was as stated above the highest since 1918).

These are ONS figures https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopula...lyinenglandandwalesprovisional/26november2021

 

I can’t remember whether it was in his book or an interview but Paul Merson said when Wenger took over they started taking pills & he didn’t know what they were.

 

Those were your figures, you said a survivability of 99.91 % - so 0.09% non-survivability.

 

The vast majority still means there are 6 million people unvaccinated. 18 of every 100k unvaccinated end up in hospital compared to 4 in every 100k of vaccinated. So if those 6 million get COVID 330k will need to go to hospital. That’s why getting vaccinated even though you can still get COVID matters.

 

That doesn't sound right (not wanting to fall out because I'm sick to the back teeth of it to be honest). But it looks like you've divided 6million by 18 to get 330,000, which is close to 5% (of 6million) being hospitalised. But your initial claim that 18 in 100,000 unvaccinated people need hospitalization is nowhere near 5%, it's closer to 0.15%. That would be around 5,000 out of 6million, a significant decrease on the figure you gave of 333,000. By the same maths, for the vaccinated... 47 million divided by 4 would mean 11,750,000 of vaccinated people would require hospitalization upon getting covid, that's huge?!

 

I was talking about the vaccine giving you an increased immunity. Clearly doesn’t seem to be doing what they claimed, eh?

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ja5T...jiTmDQXcM8hopgMAckbKVaCSIO-r5g81ShzOKQfxnCF3A

 

Before anybody opens bitchute...google it first.

 

Exactly. Took exactly 30 seconds to research them.

 

Yeah, I’m not clicking on that.

 

"It's interesting isn't it, that people will take the word of people with vested interests in the vaccines than people who have no interest but their gut is telling them there's something not quite right here"

Yes Matt, we should all be trusting ex footballers with hunches rather than medical professionals.

Bloke's a cretin.

 

It’s the same policy as with Daily Mail, the link is safe but they’re not getting my click for advertising revenue.

 

He’s done really well for himself since retiring from the game. Lots of ex-players struggle when they’re no longer involved in football but not Matt.

 

You've completely lost me there.

The vaccine does give you an increased immunity, correct.

It is doing what they claimed.

 

There’s a huge amount of scientists who claim it doesn’t give you any kind of immunity to it whatsoever. Can you prove it gives you any immunity? Because the scientists are at loggerheads over it.

Its not doing what they claimed whatsoever, they’ve panicked the world leaders into mass producing a drug that we know nothing about. It’s insanity. Natural Immunity is the only way this virus can be controlled, not shoving an unknown drug into billions of peoples arms when we have no idea of the long term effects.

 

yeah **** virologists and epidemiologists what’s Vinny Jones take? It would be hilarious if it wasn’t so serious.