That was my assumption. Used to go in wi mi grandad, back in the day. Remember meeting Andy Rammell in there playing snooker. He missed his shot.
He’s English ain’t he I,m sick of these Fukin owners they ain’t getting another bean out of me while they are in charge.
Whatever he'd have cost we'd have got it back straight away with sales of the DVD of his first training session and meeting with Mr 99.9%
An absolute dereliction of duty not getting him in this season. Everybody on here could see it would have given us a great chance of staying up. Unfortunately the deckchair arranger decided or was told it wasn't an option.
He'd be the perfect man to wheel and deal in our best interests whilst still building a competitive side, if the owners allowed him and he wanted the challenge.
Fine line between pathetic loser's and glorious winners. The players have been hung out to dry this season and should never have been relegated if it wasn't for the poor guidance and tactics. Warnock would have given us a strategy and belief that would have kept us up in my opinion.
He wouldn’t have played who he was told, where he was told to play them - and would have told them straight home truths. He may also have spoken out in the media about what he thought about the state of the club once he was inside it and realised. they wouldn’t have wanted that, so was probably never an ounce of a possibility of them setting him on, they’d have been scared to death.
Sickening to think we could still be a championship team if we had a CEO that was actually prepared to accept that we were relegation bound and appointed a tried and tested manager that actually wanted to come.
Just shows how little the clowns in Charge know about football, talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth. We might not have stayed up but he would have galvanised the fans and the club for a proper fight rather then the wax dummy we’ve had. Criminal negligence really.
Totally get your point but in an ironic way he's exactly what our owners need to help them have a successful club.
According to transfermarket he was out of work just over a year, take away about 3 months for pre-season, it isn't all that. Being out of management for that long isn't any thing out of the ordinary. Would have had no impact on wages
He would have walked all over the board, told them what to do, how to do it, would have made their life hell. Or he would himself have just walked. Imagine a confrontation between him and the 80%ers.
It's wrong ( I think) going from memory he had one months temporary work between his last sacking in 2014 and getting the Rotherham job. Edit...apologies...just to correct that, he was sacked by Leeds in 2013, got 3 months work at Palace in 2014 and one month at QPR before taking the job at Rotherham in 2016. I don't think you can omit pre-season...you're either employed by the club or not.
I understand that point. But I added that bit because how often do you see sides swapping managers after 8,9,10 games these days? Either way bud, I just don't think Rotherham could outpay us by that much just because he was unemployed for that amount of time - especially in hind sight him retiring since. And it'd certainly be cheaper than relegation. Anyway... clearly didn't happen so I suppose this bit is redundant mate
