It's being referred to quite openly by some of the reputable journalists I've seen posting today, so I assume factual. The Mail story had photos of them leaving her apartment together, but I'm more reliant on the 'common knowledge in the lobby' references than anything produced by that vile rag.
This isn’t true. The vast majority of the left got behind Starmer & voted him in over Long-Bailey. It’s only because he’s been exposed as a liar & a fraud that people have turned against him.
Glad that you know more about economics than economists. Maybe you need to pop over and tell the French there is no way they can buy the rest of EDF. They seem to think they can but they haven’t consulted with you
Nice bit of much racking. Well as Starmer had shown today he is against working class people and the right up strike so at least he’s made his position clear.
If you’re a member read the back of the membership card and see what it says. Democratic socialist party. Its right wing entryists that need to leave the party and join Change U.K. they don’t they leech on Labour.
If only Starmer had a policy. Monday we won’t nationalise rail Tuesday we will nationalise rail Wednesday we won’t nationalise rail we will keep the existing arrangements. Thursday sacks MPs for supporting striking workers.
Give me some examples of ministers or shadow cabinet members sacked for supporting striking workers before Starmer. I know the number just checking if you do.
He will get a shock. The party for the white 50+ homeowner who reads the daily Mail is already funded by billionaires.
I suspect this is the real reason for the sacking. Starmer is concerned that Lynch is far more popular than him. More articulate and more charismatic. This threatens the rich he wishes to represent so he wished to clamp down on anyone supporting them.