The protecting of a sex offender comment was not in reference to Starmer, I was more firing that comment in regards to the Royals.
Ooh bit dodgy, you might alter the course of the universe and Skynet will end with the rise of the machines. Or summat.
That part of the government's executive authority which remains theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign is known as the royal prerogative. The monarch acts within the constraints of convention and precedent, exercising prerogative only on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament, often through the prime minister or Privy Council.[11] In practice, prerogative powers are exercised only on the prime minister's advice – the prime minister, and not the sovereign, has control.
Maybe you should research the subject properly instead of relying on Britton Fursts version of events.
So you think all the times laws have been amended slightly in favour of the royal family are not at the request of the family but because the PM thought they were a good idea. Blimey some people will bend over backwards to stick to their mistaken beliefs
Well thats your opinion but if someone had died less than 24hour ago whatever i thought of them i wouldnt talk ill of them or there family thats the diffrence between me and you i suppose and a few on this board. Classless
R.I.P to Fred West. Bloke laid a great patio* But you can't really think like that can you? So everyone who dies anywhere in the world had to be respected? No matter what they've done, or what offences they've committed? *tongue in cheek post.
Your comparing the queen of 70 years to a serial killer? Im not even going to respond get into that one of the most stupidest posts ive seen but looking at who posted it no suprise.
I'm just speaking the truth that's been outlined, not my problem that you find that upsetting to hear. You're the one that said Andrew's misdemeanors are irrelevant. Classless
Two things. Is there any chance folk could leave political point scoring alone for a couple of days? Maybe next week we could have a sensible, non extremist debate about the future of the monarchy or possibly an alternative to it? Thought not.
I never said anything about andrew i came on here and said rip to the queen. Then saw some classless comments and people who obviously have a agenda to push and real dislike for the royale family.
You responded to me yesterday saying Andrew is irrelevant now, I've even liked it for you so you can find it.
Well he is isnt he? She was still warm and you came on here posting about andrew her family the energy crisis and this and that just thought it was a little distasteful but maybe me and you have been brought up differently.