Please explain to me why people put that type of question on here as soon as one of our former players is going/ rumoured to be sold? it’s not as if WE as fans get the money! If we do get any money, it’s THE clubs, and they can do whatever they want with it! We need money to pay fines due to some of the idiotic fans we have at the moment, and any such money doesn’t have to be re-invested in players anyway.
Because I support the CLUB not james bree, mason holgate or whoever else. After they leave I look out for them but hope they are sold and we get a sell on as it possibly means we don't have to sell or can bring another player in.
I don’t think so, as I thought Luton paid less to Villa than for we sold him for so no profit made for Villa. I believe at that point our financial interest ended, unlike the John Stones transfer of course, and Mason Holgate, if sold for a profit that is.
calm down . Absolutely no idea why a fan of a club with not much money wouldn’t be interested in whether were gonna make a bit of extra money from a transfer
That’s fair enough but given that we are NEVER told ANY details of transfers ie fees, clauses, subsequent transfer clauses etc, they are questions that no one here can possibly answer
I think it works that although Villa sold him for less put put a transfer % fee on Luton selling him that any money going to Villa from Luton we get a % of .
I think (well in my case) if I'm buying a season ticket or whatever I like to have a idea of what's happening in the background. Like last season I wasn't too happy about most of the budget been spunked on the 2 Belgium lads. Before I've been unhappy at the fees we have sold players for example pinnock.