Well in that case you might just want to choose your words a little more carefully in future as someone could very easily draw the wrong impression from what you're saying Also how do you figure he can recall every single incident? Logically he's only recounting the ones he remembers, there may be countless others he has forgotten.
You said i was approaching Nudger territory. Given that he was kicked off of here for being a racist and a bigot i thought you were making a comparison.
Nope, I didn’t quote you at all. I made a general comment. You’re jumping to conclusions mate, chill.
Rashid has corrobated the "there's too many of you lot" slur by Vaughan today at the hearing. Not a good look for Vaughan.
It was clear he was referring to past posts, not yours as yours had nothing to do with the brother references.
Also continuing to deny it is an even worse look. I don't think Rashid has any reason to be making stuff up or embellishing the past. It seems obvious he said it, it probably was meant as a "joke" - and as a one-off could be dismissed as just crass and insensitive but it helps paint a picture of the culture at the club which does speak to the wider issue where Vaughan thinks its ok to make those kind of "jokes".
Michael "Not Many English People Live In London" Vaughan has been found not guilty in the case. Be interesting to see what happens to the rest.
I was out with some lads last week, who were privy to the Vaughan conversation on the day in question. They categorically state that Vaughan definitely didn't say it and that Rafiq was lying about Vaughan's inclusion in his case. I'm no fan of Vaughan but no-one should have had to go through what he has based on farcical evidence.
Brilliant news for cricket particularly Yorkshire and England. It’s not yet over but well done Mr Vaughan in proving your innocence
He might be innocent in this instance but he's still a **** with a history of dubious race related comments.
Hold an enquiry based hearsay allegations and the enquiry comes to the conclusion that it's hearsay and can't be proven. Vaughan hasn't been proved innocent. It's just been proven that it can't be proven. There's a big difference.
Yet there are also multiple people coming forward saying they were definitely there, and he did definitely say it. Someone's obviously wrong. Or lying. Or both. From what I've seen, the whole thing literally seems to boil down to 'your word against mine'. The whole thing has just looked like a big mess.