What's the difference? Is it disgusting if you buy direct from the source but perfectly fine if you pay a photographer to do it for you?
Read my previous posts I'm not going over old ground. Did I ever say it was fine. If I steal a pencil from work. Am I a thief of the highest order and a criminal would I have committed theft. 100% . If so lock me up. And millions of others. It's just a view.
No I didnt. I said there is a dividing line within us all. Of what is morally acceptable. And buying porn mags is in my view acceptable. If it floats your boat. Yours morals may be different and you find it immoral . Fine. But I dont find this case to be acceptable. What the hell are you trying to prove. It's just a view. Look up the word Troll.
Give over. You made it abundantly clear that you thought porn was ok but paying someone directly was wrong. Why? Why is it ok to pay a middle man to take. Use photos of someone but it's wrong to do so directly? And whether it's a view or not there is a huge difference between sexual activity between two consenting adults and a sex crime.
OK, so if a porn mag is morally acceptable and buying photos is "extremely immoral" then you clearly do think one is a hell of a lot better than the other. I'm not being a troll at all, I'm just struggling to understand why you're happy to make punchy statements but then refusing to explain what you mean and being obtuse.
Are you suggesting that a few people are claiming to be outraged for reasons that they can't really explain but in reality it's because it's a man buying male pictures which is why they think it's ok when it's women involved? Well I am shocked
Exactly what I say to my kids too. My job is to support you to make your own decisions now you are an adult. I will tell you if I think you are wrong and why and will support them if they make the wrong ones but they make their own choices.
Kelvin MacKenzie is trending on Twitter. I can't think what he could have said which would have got people talking about him.
I won't answer to such stupidity. It was a reference not a full blown account of my views. I'll add one for the girls and gay mags to ballance it out if it helps. Coming to conclusions that are way off the mark are unnecessary.
I didn't mention porn mags in that post. If you read the thread back you'll see that I mentioned homophobia long before you mentioned porn mags. It referred to one or two other people