Moon landing

The moon is cgi

 

We're all in a simulation.

 

It's pretty much world wide mind, plenty of UK sightings.

 

It is! I've seen The Truman Show

 

The key things though is why would someone who, if what he did say was the truth, will go to prison for a long time, not confirm when or where? His objective was to get the truth out there right and **** the consequences so why did he only half tell the truth in such a way that he couldn't be proven wrong because he didn't actually say anything?

 

And yet zero evidence or independent witnesses. Remote areas seem to be of keen interest to these alines too.

 

He did in a secure environment afterwards to Congress representatives. It was agreed before the hearing how far he and the select committee would go in public as to naming people and locations. He confirmed that people have been harmed in order to keep this quiet.

 

But again, why? There's no proof that he said anything in a secure environment either. And why would a location be too much information but confirming they've got aliens be ok to say publicly? What's the difference?

 

Apart from the US Navy fighter pilot footage and hundreds of independent witness testimonies. Yes apart from that there's nothing.

 

Back in about 2006 I rolled in from a night in the pub and listened to an amazing late night interview on a talksport phone in programme with a guy who'd written a book about the moon. His argument, if I remember correctly, was that the moon wasn't heavy enough for its size, but humans also couldn't have evolved without it, so obviously at some point in the future we invent time travel and go back and build it.

There were literal astrophysicists phoning in to explain in detail why it was nonsense, but the presenter was always like "this guy's written a book which I have right in front of me - how many books have you written?".

I'm still not entirely convinced that the whole thing wasn't a drunken hallucination.

 

I get why its peaked your interest, also why you would think there must be something in it. I could be wrong, I'm open to that possibility.
I just can't look past the science of it. The nearest Star to Earth is 8blight years away I believe. Thats 8 years at the speed of the light. If a Alien race has advanced to the point of being able to travel faster than light i can't see them skulking around at night over remote areas of the Earth.

 

Surely the obvious response to him which would have ended the conversation would have been if we needed the moon to evolve then how did we get to the advanced stage of inventing time machines to go back to make the moon required to get to that stage?

 

When people see a UFO (unidentified flying objects) the fact they dont know what it is, is not evidence of what it is.
"There are some lights in the sky moving in a way I can't explain and have never seen before, it must be Aliens"

 

This guy wrote a book about it though. How many books about the moon have you written?

 

That's absolutely fine, different opinions are ok. 1000 years ago we were sailing across the channel in sailing boats firing arrows at each other, who would have known we would have advanced so much to build space shuttles and space stations. Imagine another 100 thousand years what could be possible if we haven't wiped ourselves out.

 

Indeed, It's a amazing and frightening prospect.
However I wouldn't call it a difference of opinion.
I'd say its a total lack of evidence to support a outlandish claim.

 

I've followed the subject for years, if you really think the only sightings are from people in dark out of the way locations then you don't really know enough about this.

 

Sightings of what though? Not knowing what something is doesn't make it aliens. That's just intellectually lazy.

 

With their lights on!!

 

If an alien civilization had the capability to travel that distance I'd assume they'd be so advanced that decades of travel wouldn't be an issue for them, whether through outposts or other means. Not saying I think that aliens are here, but judging hypothetical visitors in the context of our technological limitations is maybe naive.