When it comes to the point that he does leave permanently, the amount spent on him in relation to the amount he's played for us, will be remarkably high, So it is a disastrous signing. Whether that's because of his faults or the club's is a different debate.
The only thing I can really pick up on is. If the club aren't happy with him they can send him back. I dont think it's the same as a re-call clause from a parent club. Sure someone may be the wiser.
There must be an underlying reason. As I agree, he's a more than decent player on what I saw. I know there are rumours around, about his lifestyle. Smoking, Drinking. Diet etc. And definitely from present and previous managers about his lack of effort (reading between the lines) on his training attitude. He's certainly ruining his future prospects, if any of it is true. Bit like Luca. Keeping all under wraps. Understandably tbf.
We've hardly been overwhelmed with great options up top, I'm sure if he was worth a start he'd get it. It's in nobody's interest to have him draw a wage for doing nowt. 4 managers haven't played him; I think he's just a waster rather than there being some conspiracy against him.
You could be right pal, but from the little I did see of him in the championship told me there’s a half decent player there when playing in a decent side, and a side playing with confidence. I often wonder whether he has a crazy clause in his contract, like a big appearance bonus. Hence why he’s not played at all in league 1. Wouldn’t surprise me with how Conway was throwing the tenners around at that point.
Him and his pal were signed by Conman, not surprised there were suggestions of brown envelopes at the time. I also thought there was a player there but he soon put paid to that. I truly believe that some sort of performance level should be in all contracts. after all if you dint perform in your job you'd be on a action plan then out the door..
Yeah but people are saying this about every tom, dick and harry now if they dont start every week. If he was good enough, or at least wanted to try enough, he'd be in first team. He isn't, and he doesn't. It's a player f up, not a club f up (other than initial conway etc who brought him in with said brown papers being thrown about). I know we love rumours and conspiracies around the club and through that we love to bash 'em half of time over something we've seen on twitter, but it does shock me to see people actually side with Iseka on this one mate
So on Football Heaven they confirmed the club he's joined is paying 100% of his wages for the loan period and they might sign him in January.
It will be interesting to see if he comes alive next season with the security of a 4yr deal coming to an end.
Yeah if its true and if it happens!. There's something not right there with him and for some reason, its been a disaster for everybody. I didn't know there were allegations of 'payments' etc, regarding the Iseka & Oulare deals. It does make you think though!.