New Kit

Minimalism gone mad....

 

Without any white trim, that's not a Barnsley shirt. I'm out.

 

I don't get the bright yellow on the socks for the away kit. Why not go with the pink from the third kit to tie them together?
We have two back of shirt sponsors, Parliament and Rapid Response - if we're not planning a front of shirt sponsor, surely one of them would take the opportunity to move to the front? The reason it looks like a training top is because there isn't a front sponsor. Maybe moving them on the men's kit would cause issues with the women's?

 

Red looks fine to me as does grey/silver one. Pink one is dead funny and I'm gonna get it.

 

Only just seen the close ups with the detail on the pink and red shirts. Still got some stars on the red one and Toby built into the design in the pink one.
I like them. And didn’t we play in red shorts last season?

 

Not odd. Didn’t start 22/23 with a sponsor did we? Nothing new - just got a good enough offer yet, so will leave it for now.

You can’t accept a low-ball offer, as it de-values the offer. And most sponsors talk to each other, so they know what everyone’s paid.

Get off to a good start, and someone will cough up.

 

I think I need to see them in the shop and have a proper look, but from the pictures I don’t think I’ll be getting one of them

 

Don’t like the fact they’ve gone with red shorts, the kit for me would have looked better with white shorts.

I do actually like all the kit designs though - but they don’t look right without a front of shirt sponsor.

We have parliament on the back of the shirts, Rapid Response on the back of the shorts, but no main sponsor. Doesn’t look right to me. Makes them look like training shirts.

The women’s versions with VFiles on look a lot better IMO.

If at some point we gain a main sponsor and start producing shirts with the sponsor on, I’d be tempted by all three to be honest.

 

Bizarre thing is, the home kit would be ok if it had white trim and white shorts. It will look better with sponsors in place.

Away would look better with black shorts.

3rd! It’s not even I nice shade of pink.

 

Definitely needs a sponsor

 

The home one and the white away one look ok. Be better once the sponsor is added (provided it is not a huge ugly hex style sponsor) really not a fan of the pink one though but I am sure some will like it.

I have plenty of time to decide if I want one or not as they don't go on sale for a while, and even when the first one drops end of this month, I will have to wait until end of August as only launches in Kids and sizes S-L. Sizes XL and above won't be available until end of August.

 

But will they offer free of charge the chance for people to take their shirt back to the club shop and have the sponsor printed on?

 

Absolutely class you miserable gits.

 

Looking forward to seeing loads of fat blokes like me in bright fluorescent pink Barnsley shirts walking down Oakwell Lane on August 9th.

 

Yeah, they did last time - always have done.

 

All truly horrid.

 

They're a bit too plain to not have a sponsor on. The women's version looks like a football kit, whereas the men's looks just like a training kit.

Still, better than last season's home kit I'd say.

 

That's the tattiest load of tat I think has ever been released. Patiently awaiting our front of shirt sponsor to be announced as TEMU to be in keeping with the quality of those kits.

They haven't even bothered to run an iron over the ch*ffing shorts!

Amateur hour strikes again.

Broad scheme of things, not really a huge deal. But my question is, aside from making us look like a Sunday league side, what has JAQ actually done?

 

With the sponsor on they don't actually look that bad. I assume we are still looking for a sponsor, if not why not have VFILES on both kits?

 

The away shirt looks the best tbf. Nice idea with the rose tbf.