Huw Edwards

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Shepley Red, Jul 29, 2024.

  1. jud

    judith charmers Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    5,581
    Likes Received:
    5,302
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Travel advisor
    Location:
    Barbados
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    If it’s true and he’s guilty he’d be another who needs some concrete boots and a trip to North Sea
     
  2. man

    mansfield_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    10,349
    Likes Received:
    17,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Unless I'm reading it wrong someone who he was chatting with sent him some underage porn pictures and Edwards told him to stop. I'm not saying there should be no consequences, but it doesn't sound like he's some sort of mega-nonce
     
  3. Bre

    BreweryStander Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,170
    Likes Received:
    1,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    As a defence that doesn't stack up if you kept the pictures or failed to report the source to the authorities. It seems that he admitted possessing 41 images which he had requested.
     
  4. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,014
    Likes Received:
    11,464
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Over an 18 month period I believe.
     
    BreweryStander likes this.
  5. troff

    troff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    10,270
    Likes Received:
    14,245
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    donny
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Some of the images were of a child aged between 7 and 9; the majority age 12 - 15.

    Not the 17 year old at all. He did tell the sender to stop sending them; apparently didn’t keep them or send them on. But he reported nothing. And the finer details don’t look good.

    The hearing for sentencing will no doubt have his legal team offering plenty of mitigation. Including his recent history of serious mental health issues.

    I suspect he won’t get a custodial sentence. Especially if he’s been co-operative throughout and has pleaded guilty at the first opportunity.
     
    Stephen Dawson likes this.
  6. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    35,148
    Likes Received:
    30,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Confessed. Awaiting sentencing on 16th Sept.
     
  7. Stephen Dawson

    Stephen Dawson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2018
    Messages:
    35,148
    Likes Received:
    30,312
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    My Dad said that.
     
  8. John Peachy

    John Peachy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2011
    Messages:
    17,373
    Likes Received:
    17,035
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The littlest hobo
    Location:
    Leeds, United Kingdom
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I suspect you are right. I feel sorry for his wife & family.
     
    Redstone likes this.
  9. Sco

    Scoff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    9,067
    Likes Received:
    7,791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    The interface between business and technology
    Location:
    Brampton by the Sea
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    CP is a strict liability offence. If someone sends you some and you open it - you've broken the law. If you go to the authorities, you could well be charged even if it was unsolicited. They would also go after the person sending the images too.

    It does leave it open to ruin someone by sending them images that are illegal.
     
  10. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,279
    Likes Received:
    23,650
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Pretty sure you are reading it wrong and I also think "underage porn" is a bit of a soft description

    "They included seven category A images, the most serious classification - two of which showed a child aged between about seven and nine."

    That means they are photos of a small child being raped
    I cant believe he got sent those by accident. The guy sending them was a known nonce so why was Edwards chatting to him
     
  11. man

    mansfield_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    10,349
    Likes Received:
    17,113
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ah right, thanks for clarifying.
     
  12. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    58,320
    Likes Received:
    25,242
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That's it. He did the right thing in telling the person not to send underage, not keeping them and not sharing them.

    Where he messed up was not reporting it to the police and instead of blocking the person carry on chatting to them.
     
  13. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,220
    Likes Received:
    14,017
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  14. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    28,086
    Likes Received:
    22,785
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Obviously I totally condemn what he's done, and he should feel the full force of the law. However when I read up on the charges, I was surprised to see the legal definition of 'making indecent images'. I imagine most people will probably hear 'making indecent images' and assume the person has been directly involved in creating them. But that isn't necessarily the case, which I personally think is a misleading definition.

    "The court’s interpretation of ‘making’ indecent images is broad and the following can amount to making indecent images; opening an email attachment, downloading an indecent image, storing an image, and accessing a website where an indecent image “pops up”.

    But just to be 100% clear, I'm not trying to defend him in any way. I just think the legal definition of the charge is potentially misleading.
     
  15. Jay

    Jay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    42,696
    Likes Received:
    30,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    On Sofa
    Style:
    Barnsley
    I would imagine, although I don't know this to be the case, it's because a file is just zeros and ones, and it's not until a piece of software capable of reading that file and rendering it does it become an image. If I email a jpeg to you, created on my camera at the Barnsley match last night, I send a file, it's not until you open it in the relevant software that it is made into an image. They used to use the word pseudo-image as anyone who used this site back in the day will remember, but I'm guessing that proved too problematic.
     

Share This Page