I know the lads not the tallest but he's got to be practicing his headers in training. Two sitters he's missed last two matches.
As I’ve just put in the MDT, I wonder, after seeing Nwakali today but not being convinced (yet) he has the defensive ability and awareness to play holding on his own against better sides, whether we change things a bit and play home with Connell in a two, wing backs either side, and have Phillips and Russell support the striker (prob Humphrys in the main); DKD as an impact sub to switch up and compete for a shirt with Russell and Phillips. I’ve seen little from him to convince me he’s worthy of the guaranteed start he seems to have each week.
I think if DKD hadnt cost around three quarters of a million, he wouldn't be getting so many starts. I think as the fee we paid is big by our standards and it was known we had been chasing him ages, we feel we have to play him.
I thought he was largely anonymous and the only reason he wasn’t substituted was we had no replacement on the bench. Im not 100% convinced we can play him and Phillips together, we look too open.
Luckily Humphrys scored or we would have been calling him greedy for not squaring it to DKD for a tap in and would instead be talking about another DKD goal. Next weekend he might just be the fall guy for Nwakali to keep his place.
All good strikers are a bit greedy. It was a good finish, especially after running 60 yards. Poor keeper positioning helped but maybe he didn’t realise how good his left foot is
That cross from the right came at him like a rocket and a tad too high so i think he should be allowed a little leniency.
We've been crying out for players that get you on the edge your seat for ages. Now we have two in the same side in DKD and Humphrys. Cut the lad some slack.
We thought that too. Bit harsh for anyone to slate him for missing that. I wouldn’t describe it as anything close to a sitter
