Marsh

Come off it, Humphrys is miles better than Marsh probably ever will be. He’s been played wide left under CH, his natural position, and has looked more than decent. Agree about Watters though. He certainly couldn’t offer much less than him.

 

Humps as a striker was terrible to be fair. Id too probably play Marsh ahead of him in that position. Youre right about him looking 10x the player in a wingers position though.

 

He needs to go & play games. He could end up like George Smith & not be quite good enough for the football league & have a decent conference / conference north type career or he might end up working his way back up the leagues like a Jordan Clark but I don’t feel like he’s got a chance if he stays with us.

If he wasn’t rated highly enough to get games this season over Humphrys & Cosgrove then he isn’t going to be starting them next season for us & at 22 he’s got to go & play regular football.

 

I think that sums it up to be fair.
Even though he probably wasn't given a decent enough run of games, compared to some others.
There must be reasons as to why he wasn't rated, even during one of our worst ever times of poor strikers at the club.
Obviously his future lies elsewhere, and not with us.

 

This 100 percent wish him all the best but he just needs competitive game time. He looked promising a few years ago but never really kicked on, same as Bland jalo and flavell and any young players you'll only develop with competitive games.

 

100% geoff was a top lad too

 

And Geoff went on to better things as others have leaving BFC