1) BFC send a letter to the London Tykes threatening legal action if its contents are made public. 2) BFC publish details of confidential contract negotiations with Nardiello on their website.</p> </p> Hmm, let me think for a second...... </p> </p> </p>
disagree if they'd quoted stuff like terms and conditions or his salary then I could accept the argument. They have only said there were negotiations going on, and we all knew that anyhow.
RE: Just out of interest Well, we now know via the website: i) that a contract was agreed in principle on Friday. ii) the details of two telephone calls between player and club regarding the (non)-signature of the contract. These are typically things that don't make it into the public domain, wouldn't you say? Don't get me wrong, I'm not taking sides against BFC regarding how Nardiello behaved here. I'm just more intrigued by the fact that, when it suited them to do so, they had no qualms about 'going public'.
Dont see as owt confidential has been published I believe they made it public as they knew the amount of criticism that would have been levelled at them once Nardiello signed elsewhere without some sort of explanation.
RE: Dont see as owt confidential has been published I think I'd class avoiding criticism as a a good example of 'when it suited them to do so'.
Still dont see as they have done owt wrong in the Nardiello affair just doing a bit off a PR job which makes a change.
agreed mate I think the Pr at the club is shocking but can hardly go and criticse them for being as open as they can about something as important as the nardiello contract
