Latest from Flitcroft........

Not true. He was playing well under MR at the end of the 2010/11 season. Then the berk halted his progress.

 

I wouldn't say I've never rated him but I've never seen what it is lots of other people (and managers) see to keep giving him a chance. But he needs a run to either prove himself or prove he's not good enough.

Jennings has looked poor, but he's been poor for about 30 minutes of football - that's all I've seen him. He's obviously got talent or he wouldn't have been so highly sought after but he's not played a single pro game in 2 years, he needs patience and games and the only way to get that is for him to play. He's been thrown in, it's not worked so far and maybe it'll take a bit longer than everyone hoped but the ***** he's had since Saturday isn't going to help is it?

Lazarus should go out on loan if Flitcroft isn't going to play him. But that doesn't stop Flitcroft looking a **** - he needs to learn to keep his mouth shut.

 

Agree with all that, pretty much.

I just want the best for/from my club, despite what some may think.

For the record, I think Bobby's looked poor in this 21's game.

 

RNL drives forwards with the ball, his distribution imho is spot on, always looking for the positive option. He's strong on the ball and isn't afraid to shoot. Against Hudds whilst playing wing back he helped create our goals by pushing on, creating space for the delivery of at least one of them if memory serves.

Again imho he could happily play left hand side of a 4 man midfield.

Even if I thought he was toss, Flitcroft's handling/management of him is pitiful.

 

It might be confidence that's his problem but I can rarely recall seeing him and thinking 'he's got it'.

But agree entirely. If I was him I'd be asking to leave - 'he needs 40 games' and then he's not picked. Flitcroft must think he's not good enough since his Bournemouth revelations.

 

What were they?

 

That the players he had weren't good enough and his squad needed surgery.

 

Probably because he was instructed not to attack like the rest of the side

 

Who are they? Unless we've signed some MORE players, you must mean Dawson and Tutu.

I'd be hard pressed to say either have more talent than Hassell.

 

Valid.

 

"RNL drives forwards with the ball, his distribution imho is spot on, always looking for the positive option. He's strong on the ball and isn't afraid to shoot. "

I think you've just spotted why he isn't wanted....

 

But one if the worst culprits from that game still plays and another got his way back in on Sat.

 

The man had lost it big time, oh dear....

 

Had nothing to do with attacking or the lack of it. He was chasing shadows and positionably terrible

 

You're telling me you think hassell is a better cm than Dawson or tutu? Behave.

 

Not by himself with that description. Dawson kept getting picked being like that and Perkins still is.

 

Ones a headless chicken the other is soft as **** or has been this season. So in that context, yes.

 

Wiseman is generally perceived as Mr consistent this season, rightly so. M'voto is getting better game by game and Kennedy had his best game this season on Saturday. We have signed championship quality in Cranie, ramage and nyatanga so you are clearly talking out of your rectum.

 

With all these up to it defenders, I am amazed our goals against column is so bad.

 

Summat's not quite adding up.