colgan 7 hassell 9 tonge 7 austin 7 kay 6 shuker 6 mcphail 7 devaney 9 howard 6 richards 7 hayes 7 nads 6 jarman 7 r williams 7
We were playing against a very poor team from a division lower who didn't raise their game for the occasion and at the end we just hung on for a 1:0 win! How on earth can you give two of the team a 9? No one was worth more than a 6! We were very poor!! How can you give Nardielo the same as Kay, Shuker and Howard! You would be better off scoring for Strictly Come Dancing!
I'll have a go then, not that it'll be any better! Colgan 7 Austin 7 Hassell 8 MOTM Kay 6 Tonge 7 Devaney 7 Howard 7 McPhail 6 Shuker 7 Hayes 7 Richards 6 Subs Jarman 5 Nardiello 5 Williams 6.
No No No The fact that we won and kept another clean sheet, and missed loads of chances mean we must have been crap. No one in the team can be worth more than a 4 - and that includes Colgan who only made one save of note. N|B I wasnt there but I've got special powers so I'm right FACT
RE: No No No Yeah they were all useless, oh aye. For 15 minutes we played superbly, there were some really excellent moves. I think the lack of any opposition bored our players to be honest so when Darlo finally woke up and tried to attack we struggled a tad. You'd think we'd lost wouldn't you?!
player ratings <p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">colgan 8</font></p><p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">hassell8</font></p><p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">austin8</font></p><p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">kay6Subbed)ht</font></p><p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">tonge 8</font></p><p align="left"><font face="georgia,times new roman,times,serif" size="1">mcphail7</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">shuker 7(subbed)ht</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">howard7</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">devaney 9 MOTM in my opinion</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">richards7</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">hayes7</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">williams5 came on ht</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">jarman7 came on ht</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">nardiello5</font></p><p align="left"><font face="Georgia" size="1">although a few players played well the overall performance was dissapointing and they need to play a full match and not just one half!!!! just one real gripe NARDIELLO needs to pull his socks up his last two performances have been shocking where does ritchie get off thinking that hes better than CONLON at least conlon tried!!!!!!!!!!</font></p>
Shuker 6? OK he was subbed at half time, but if you are judging solely on his time on the pitch it should be 8 or 9, he ripped them apart
RE: No No No I remember Man United & Chelsea being oh so bored with our oppostion in the Premiership & besting us by just 1 goal!! What pathetic excuse is that!?!?:S
RE: Shuker 6? You are not allowed to say that you know!! The fact that after he was injured we lacked possession is wholly his fault!! And what was he playing at giving that ball to Richards that led to the goal? I think 6 is way too generous a score!
RE: Err Devaney had a good game? MOTM? Are you sure you weren't watching Strictly Come Dancing? He would definitely have scored 9's there but as a footballer, you have to be joking. He wouldn't get past my 12 year old granddaughter and he'd struggle to get past her 3 year old sister.
You obviously need some new glasses then. Everyone I know commented how well he played on the 2nd half on the right.
RE: You and your friends need to get rid of the Rose Tinted ones and start watching in the clear. Maybe you're using those Virtual Reality things instead of real ones.
Most of my friends didn't rate him and as far as I am concerned the jury was still out. Since he has played on the right however he has looked a different player and opinions have changed. I suppose the the way he waltzed past three players to set up Howard's winner last week has been erazed from your memory. Do you enjoy being so negative?
RE: Most I thought we were talking about this weekends match not last weekends. It actually wasn't ever in my memory because I wasn't able to get to the match last week. I am sure that if you go back over all the games he's played in, you'll be able to find enough little snippets to convince yourself that he is a good player but you'll never convince me that he had a good game on Saturday. I don't really see how the fact that I don't agree with your idea of what makes a player good or bad makes my opinions negative, can you explain that?
He had a good game in the 2nd half on Saturday when he played on the right, mainly because is right footed. Nearly every chance we created in the second half came via him. In the first half he was was poor when he played on the left. Don't you agree he is a far better in his natural position.
RE: He had a good game in the I do agree that he is better on the right than he is on the left but he is still a fairy and should stick to dancing. I get the feeling that some one once called him "twinkletoes" and that he now feels that he has to try and live up to the name.
No offence But I agree with Mr Angry, Devaney had a very good game on Saturday, skinned there left back all the time and delivered some good balls into the area...