Should he be fired? I don't think so myself. He's been slagged off in the past for not having balls and although he made some poor decisions tatics and selection wise, at least he had the balls to make them. It's the players who earn more in a week than people who save lives do in years that should have a look at themselves. A bunch of overated failures of the highest order. The only two plus points are Barnsley are more important and we don't have to endure a summer of the English press making out we have a chance of claiming a major tournment. It's the higher ups that should be sacked for appointing the wrong man. Fancy giving the job to someone part of the failed Sven regime, just because he's a yes man. Carson is a shower of ***** and Robinson should have started. Yes he makes mistakes, but he keeps plenty of clean sheets and hadn't let so many in previously. Beckham not starting was a joke, but it's over now. Long ball tatics to Crouch is not the football we want to play.
I like your post, no he shouldnt be sacked then this "Carson is a shower of ***** and Robinson should have started. Yes he makes mistakes, but he keeps plenty of clean sheets and hadn't let so many in previously. Beckham not starting was a joke, but it's over now. Long ball tatics to Crouch is not the football we want to play." I guess Mclaren isnt responsible for this and should keep his job!
RE: If he doesn't go it is disgrace Have to agree with that mate. That's why Hamilton coming second in his computerised car, might beat the likes of Hatton or Calazghe from winning Sports Personality Of The Year (N) (N) (N)
'One cross, then we might as well have played with ten men.' Yes but a cross of remarkable technique, something Wright-Phillips simply isn't capable of. Beckham justified why he should have started with that cross alone.
