Looks like Huddersfield are definitely getting werling. I'd take him back, especially on a free.</p> http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11719_4822432,00.html </p>
Defensively, he's terrible. However, going forward, I rated him and well, his free kicks speak for themselves.
Werling was a luxury that we carried as we were playing well at the time (which i dont think had anything to do with werling) He would be shown up in our current team, Kozluk is a far better defender. Saying that, id rather have him then El Hamiour!!
Its Official then! And he wanted to move to a bigger club! http://www.htafc.com/page/NewsDetail/0,,10312~1526854,00.html
I would have had him back. He was poor defensively (he was improving) but he was a decent player going forward. He seemed to have a bit of presence on the pitch. And whoever said he only had 1 decent free kick, are you mad. He was very consistent with his accuracy. Alot used to get blocked but it caused havoc in defence. There were a few that created goals. He would have done job for us on left of midfield, 6 mth contract with extension if he performs, and for free, we have missed a trick there.
Werling weren't a luxury he made things happen, he was one of the best crosses of a ball I seen down at Oakwell Kozluk could'nt lace his boots.
What people see in Kozluk i dont know, he does one good tackle every game and thats it , he's deffinatley the weak link in our team, players get away from him so easily and he offers nothing going forward. Last season he couldnt even get in the team up until after christmas, its only because El Hamour is so bad that he's in the team now. Werling was far more effective in the team.