Think I'd go 2 up front. Be brave. Also, if its looking likely that Yiadom is off, then I would prefer to put Pinillos straight in.
Lloyd Isgrove is still injured, apparently still recovering from a dead leg. So I would give Dylan Motley Henry a chance down the right and swap Hammill to the left, so he can cut in.
You couldn't sleep either? Can't disagree with this line up, though I'm thinking Bradshaw may be better as a sub. When starting, he spends an hour battling against the oppositions defence before getting subbed and leaving the field totally knackered. Maybe let Thiam have a start, in a two, rough em up a bit then introduce Bradshaw's fresh legs against tiring defenders.
If that's the case, I agree with your sentiment but I think then we'll either do something pointless like put Potts out there on the wing or we'll try 352 again. I reckon Cavare could do a job on the wing, and bring Yiadom in for Isgrove in that case.
I'm worried they've not cleaned the bird ***** off my seat. So if I've moved down one by the time you get to the ground, either you or your young un will have to go home
Assuming every ones fit that would be my team also.Maybe I'd have Yids at left back but if the club know he is moving on that starting 11 is our strongest at the moment.
Based om what..? One grafts his b@llacks off on his own, and still scores.. Verses another, who plays like a headless chicken and couldn't hit a cows ar5e with a banjo.. But he is a ..fans favourite.. so blinkers are clearly on ,
Sorry vesp if that came over a bit strong.. but he's been here half a season and done sweet FA.. It just highlight how desperate we are up front. He offers nothing Just my opinion
As much as I admire Bradshaw for his work rate I think Thiam is actually a much better all-round player. Needs to add goals but, in much the same way that Bradshaw is feeding off scraps, so is Thiam.
Yeah, I know what you're saying, in all honesty I'd have hoped for another option up front by now... All I'm saying is Bradshaws goals have dried up too & Thiam could probably benefit from a few starts. Again, like you say, all opinions init.
To me another example of us buying the wrong type of player for the system we want to play. Would be better as part of a 3 with a central focal point. Looks lost as a CF whatever his positive points are.