He's currently frantically trying to use Google Translate. I hope you put something in here that wouldn't translate properly.
I think you gave us the biggest clue to your identity last night. I can't find the post now but you posted something I have only ever seen Phil post on here. When ridiculing someone's opinion you posted hahahahahahaha It may be coincidence and it wouldn't stand up in court but the clues are piling up.
Why is everyone suddenly calling HT Phil? Why can't he be Hemsworth Tyke? If he resurfaces under his normal guise (tbh I don't think OGC is HT) do we all call him Phil? And if so why? Plus why are so many bothered anyway? It's the content you post that counts, nothing else. Shirley.
Ogc maybe , or maybe not be HT . The truth is most of the people who keep bringing up HT secretly miss him .
I am happy to admit that I do miss Hemsworth Tyke. Genuinely. His views on all things BFC were certainly not mainstream, but his passion for both the club, and for football in general, was unquestionable. He'd air his views then suffer a tirade of abuse, but I don't ever recall him retaliating, or resorting to name calling. He just soldiered on in the belief that he would eventually get folk to come round to his way of thinking...which he inevitably never did. I'm not even sure if he got banned, gave it up as a bad job, or simply got bullied off the forum, but it's a weaker forum without him, like him or not.
HT or not HT. That is the question. Did the Earl of Oxford write Shakespeare? Does OGC write HT? Does it matter, or is what matters what they write?
I was actually reading about Edward de Vere today, the Oxfordian theory is quite excellent and entirely plausible.
Don't start me off with that. I've spent endless hours ploughing through it. But just read de Vere's own published poetry. It's a silver bullet.