What got me abart that he was showing Stendel he had been stamped on or studs darn leg complaining but he did the same to one of theirs in the first haif. just got his own back their player. They dunt like it up em these Germans he he.
But there was consitency. Their way their player went down it looked a more serious injury. Ok it turned out it wasn't and strangely moved to his leg but is that the refs fault? With an unbiased head on and if you were responsible for players safety would you have stopped the game for their player with the way he went down and didn't move? Now with the same unbiased head on did Bahre look seriously injured and in imminent danger when he sat down?
The ref was right at the side of play when it happened pointed to his head and it turned out to be his leg. Surely if he was watching the play he could tell if the player had took a knock to his head or leg he was close enough. I'm not saying bahre injury was serious he was trying to walk it off and then ended up going down. I aren't been biased I told you.my opinion on events they may differ to yours. You are one of the few who think they was a foul in the free kick to their goal I thought it was soft will have to watch it back and decide.
How's about this train of thought? Maybe the refs go into games with no bias, but get a bit carried away with themselves as the game progresses?
Referees are 100% influenced by players who know how to invite a tackle and make it look like they have been shot. Tough job being a ref.....Charlton are very good at the "dark arts" and they defo influenced the ref yesterday. For this reason....he had a poor game.