Moore or Woodrow

Away from the politics - who do you think the better player all round is? Both in good goalscoring form. I like Moore but as others have mentioned he can have the first touch of an aircraft carrier and has missed some pretty bad sitters. Woodrow seems to make fewer mistakes up top but is involved in build up play less IMO. Thoughts?

 

Woodrow seems to be an instinctive finisher. That's more likely to survive the higher up the leagues he plays.
That said I like them both and want to see them remain as a front two.

 

Great question.....honestly, a really couldn’t split them, a think they both offer great assists in different approaches. A think they could make a good paring for a few years to come if the powers that be allow it and we could hopefully get promotion this season

 

Woodrow , no brainer.

 

Woodrow the better finished.
Moore offers you something else and is one of the biggest target men in the football league both great assists.

 

Wish it wasn't, but that seems highly unlikely with the whole club philosophy. Both be gone in the next 2 years I'd imagine with replacements who may be better or may be worse.

 

I think they have the makings of a good pairing, though I'm not sure how long we'll have both of them.

If we were only playing one up top though, I'd play Woodrow. More composed and clinical and it encourages us to play it on the floor rather than hopeful hoofs.

 

It's a long time since we've had two strikers who have such a good scoring record for the team. Two hard working lads with totally different styles who compliment each other. Personally, I like and rate them both.

 

I like both but think Woodrow has more potential. Not sure Moore has the composure or self belief to push on in a higher league.

 

Woodrow has more potential in the Championship

 

Both at present but I think Woodrow has more championship potential.

 

Oh good, another binary choice thread.

My answer is 'Both'.

 

Both for me. Hope we can keep them for a while yet and they bring different attributes to the team.

Be disappointed if we lost either of them.

 

Both great strikers but Woodrow just has that little more composure in front of goal

 

Moore is involved more because he wants the ball all the time hence finding himself in strange positions and sometimes crossing the ball instead of being on the end of it , whereas Woodrow stays central looking for the runs in behind . Not the classic partnership but I don't care a jot as long as they keep knocking them in . If I had to choose I'd go Moore , scores the same amount of goals but he's a foot taller which helps in both boxes .

 

Woodrow who will be premier league bound one day. He can have just one chance all game and win you the game.

 

It’s like the old Aylott/Parker debate!

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

 

Moore has the height advantage and may even be a bit quicker but that's about it. Woodrow a much better all round footballer and finisher.

 

Get off that fence. It's creaking

 

Tough to call. I like both.

I think people are being a bit tough on Moore. He is most definitely capable of playing and scoring in the championship.

Woodrows finishing is top class and only needs one chance. Moore seems to have more influence on the game but may need 2/3 chances before he scores - that said, he finds himself in the positions.