The "treasonous" MPs are trying to do their best for their constituents, the constituents just don't realise as they're too busy screaming "Will of the people" and "out means out" whilst failing to consider/ignoring (despite the overwhelming evidence) why leaving will be infinitely worse than staying.
Why is trying to stop this country committing a massive act of self-harm traitorous?? Genuinely curious.
The demographic changes alone could be enough to swing the outcome. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-yougov-second-referendum-peter-a8541971.html
Corbyn told his followers to reject May's deal from the start. That was before he heard what she proposed. All he was bothered about was her and the conservative downfall and not for what the people wanted or the benifit of the British people. Now, I'd vote for a no deal.
Why is what Jeremy Corbyn has done of the remotest relevance to the sense or otherwise of leaving the EU?
I really can't get my head around the concern of the Will of the People, when it's completely absent any other time.
No guarantee that the signatures are even eligible to vote in the UK. Or used multiple email addresses.
I fully agree that Corbyn is simply interested in getting into Number 10. Which is what you said. I fail to see what that has to do with anyone wanting to come out of the EU with no deal. Unless you are making entirely separate points.