In the first game - who threw the lead away? Walton. Did Murray take Walton off and put himself in the nets? No. So you'd have replaced Walton. Did Murray? No Who got us a point today? Walton. It's not Murray's fault we don't have a decent strikeforce. He did the best with what he's got.
Well done Adam. A good job in the circumstances. You're clearly respected by the players and that's good enough for me. Good luck with the new boss also!!
If "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts, every day would be Christmas. as my old Nan used to say when I was a nipper (bless her soul)
Where are the posters to back up their claims? These players that wouldn’t play for Murray, FACT, must be somewhere?
I may as well enjoy a feeling of op If ifs and buts were pots and pans, there'd be nothing left for the tinker man.
If it does I think he should go. He's not integral to the coaching set up or an ex red with particular knowledge of the club. On the other hand if Ishmael is happy to have him then that's fine too. But it should be the managers call.
Don't see why it should, he'll go back to being assistant coach. I'm very sure that Ismael will need Murray in the next few weeks to get him up to speed on the players and tactics of the club philosophy as we are intent on proceeding with the gegenpress