Electoral Reform....think on

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by Marc, Nov 4, 2020.

  1. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    28,399
    Likes Received:
    23,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I know a lot question our FPTP system but f.cuk me, it's an absolute dream compared to the shambles in America. The world must be looking on in astonishment - both democratic and totalitarian countries. Over 50 different sets of State rules for voting. Surely they have to sort that out?
     
    Last edited: Nov 4, 2020
    Redhelen likes this.
  2. Don

    Donks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,327
    Likes Received:
    2,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    This election has been a real eye-opener for me. I had no idea quite how bad the American electoral system is. It’s grossly unfair and open to manipulation.
     
  3. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,072
    Likes Received:
    11,516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    The American system seems to have the same overall problem as FPTP, in that not every vote is of equal importance.
     
    John Peachy likes this.
  4. Jimmy viz

    Jimmy viz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Messages:
    29,684
    Likes Received:
    19,158
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Ballet Dancer
    Location:
    Hiding under the bed
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    There are many forms of PR. It’s j based on a hybrid of FPTP. We need to move away from FPTP it’s not fit for purpose that doesn’t mean we should move towards an electoral college model
     
    Merde Tete and Redstone like this.
  5. Brush

    Brush Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Messages:
    16,958
    Likes Received:
    15,945
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Ex-IT professional
    Location:
    Swadlincote, South Derbyshire
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Precisely, both systems are equally bad from that respect. The only saving grace for ours is that we don't vote for a party leader but for a local MP who is accountable to their constituents. I have no idea how the members of the electoral college are accountable because as far as I can see, their only job is to elect the President. The House of Representatives is closest to our House of Commons but with much less power. If you set out to create a completely incomprehensible system theirs is what you'd get.
     
    Old Goat, Merde Tete and Redstone like this.
  6. Young Nudger

    Young Nudger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    14,466
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Counting great crested newts
    Location:
    Hiding in a reed bed at the local RSPB nature rese
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Make Votes Matter.
    Proportional representation.
     
  7. Don

    Donks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,327
    Likes Received:
    2,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    PR, but with a minimum threshold of 5% so you don’t get the lunatic fringe holding the balance of power. The largest party get their votes instead, so you have at least one strong party.
     
  8. Tarntyke

    Tarntyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    Messages:
    14,886
    Likes Received:
    13,096
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Stairfoot, b4 famous rahnderbart
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It’s important to have a strong opposition especially when there’s a shower in power like we have
     
  9. Don

    Donks Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    2,327
    Likes Received:
    2,930
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    True, but I’m not sure that a rainbow coalition giving disproportionate power to fringe parties is a desirable outcome.

    See the Ulster Unionists for details.
     
  10. Runner

    Runner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1,185
    Likes Received:
    1,073
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Software developer
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Having grown up with it, I couldn't agree more!
     
    Merde Tete likes this.
  11. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Agree with that but the Tory’s and some labour politicians vigorously campaigned against this in the 2011 referendum and the country rejected it .
    It would almost end the two party franchise in this country .
    With the Tory’s coming out on top over the years it’s they who lose the most and are staunchly against in effect voting against themselves .
    Most working class and minority groups cling to the Labour Party for protection against a upper class leaning Tory Party .
    If we had proportional representation imo we would have a fairer ruling government whereas their performance and voting actions would be under more scrutiny than it is with party protectionism’s .
    I think we’d see a more diverse government than the ones we are used to with less partisan attitudes.
    Not gonna happen though as the usual lies from both party’s as the last referendum exposed and the British people are normally gullible to one party or another have both party’s in each ear will vote it away again imo.
     
  12. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    28,399
    Likes Received:
    23,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I do support PR. The risk however, is when c.nuts like Farage come along, he's able to do real damage
     
  13. leebrilleaux

    leebrilleaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    586
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Student, yes a Student even at my age!
    Location:
    Concrete Canyon
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    This is the sort of misguided stuff that is portrayed in our media. What you claim is the risk is not the risk - the Brexit party polled just 2% of the vote in 2019 add this to the Tories 43.6% only gets them to 45.6% still well short of a majority.

    The risk is when in a hung parliament an increase of just 1.2% of the vote gets such a large majority. The Tories went from 42.4% of the vote in 2017 to 43.6% of the vote in 2019 In terms of the number of seats they went from 299 to 365 in other words an increase in the vote of 1.2% gets an increase in the number of seats of 22.1%
     
    ScubaTyke likes this.
  14. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    28,399
    Likes Received:
    23,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Wouldn't UKIP have won over 80 commons seats under PR, in the 2015 election?
     
  15. leebrilleaux

    leebrilleaux Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2017
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    586
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Student, yes a Student even at my age!
    Location:
    Concrete Canyon
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The UKIP party would yes, have won circa 82 seats

    UKIP 12.6%
    Tories 36.9% (They had a 12 seat majority)

    These two parties together make 49.5% of the votes - so they still do not make a majority

    Despite my disliking of Farage (and I'm being kind there) I do not see what the issue is.

    Simply PR is a much more democratic and fairer system than we have at present
     
  16. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,072
    Likes Received:
    11,516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    The 2011 vote wasnt for proportional representation was it? It was the alternate vote which wouldn't have made much difference.
     
  17. Marlon

    Marlon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    23,677
    Likes Received:
    14,562
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    HERE.
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    It’s a kind of PR or that’s what the Lib Dem’s tried to sell it as at the time .
    Don’t know about it not making much difference there was a vigorous campaign against and John Prescott called it an abomination and how much he wanted the status quo to get into the Tories in the House of Lords .
    I’m a Labour Party member and would vote for PR tomorrow. .
    Lots of people vote Labour as a protection against the Tories so it would be better if MPs were voted on their records rather than Party lines imo . Hopefully the Tory and Labour Party would be redundant if MPs had to represent their constituencies to be voted in rather than Party lines .
     
  18. Marc

    Marc Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    28,399
    Likes Received:
    23,455
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ah ok. Not misguided stuff then. I did actually say I support PR, by the way.
     
  19. Redstone

    Redstone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    16,072
    Likes Received:
    11,516
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    Wasn't really what the lib dems wanted it was as far as the tories would go when agreeing the coalition to allow them a referendum.
     
  20. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,391
    Likes Received:
    23,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    But if the tories or UKIP had got an extra 1% and therefore a majority - I would be unhappy but its fine as thats in line with the majority of voters
    The Tories currently can do as they please due to a huge majority of MP's - but thats not a reflection of voting - well over half the voters voted against them - to me thats wrong
     
    Redstone likes this.

Share This Page