OK. Let's juat say that the opposition to the war in parliament came from a the hamdful of Labour MPs, Corbyn being one of them.
They would have, that's why it was called a "special relationship". Churchill, Thatcher, Major all did whatever the Americans wanted militarily. The first time we didn't was Syria in 2013.
Outside of Parliament, there were also critics to the Iraq invasion at the time, who would go on to be a Labour MP https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2003/mar/17/foreignpolicy.iraq1
Don't know where TB gets his 91% figure from. Watched a programme on Wednesday morning re-23rd. Leading virologist claimed first jab would give around 57% immunity with follow up shot boosting that to around 95%. Wharever the true figures are, he said that it made sense to give as many vulnerable people as possible the first shot from the current stocks that we hold.
It's something to do with the fact that immunity builds slowly after having the jab and the 57% is for shortly after the first jab with 91% reached a day or so after the second jab but if it takes a while to get into your system then the 91% must be still down to the first jab as the second isn't doing anything yet.
When people voted Blair they didn't vote a tory so poor argument that its just the same as "but corbyn". Alot of innocent lives lost over a war that shouldn't have happened and were still feeling the effects of it.
When tony bliar speaks my first instinct is whats in it for him. Does nothing that isnt a direct benefit to him and or his toad faced wife.