Ref admits mistake

You obviously don’t get it. So why bother. You are entrenched in your thoughts. Seeing it your way. I’ll see it mine. Did you actually read my last post.

 

Get a grip.

 

Indeed. Why bother. Except I won't stand back and let a whole section of people be used as an insult. Especially on a day of memorial of their persecution.

 

Answer my questions.

 

Not asking you to stand back. Do what you like. Don’t expect me to agree with you. It was aimed. repeat aimed at the fact he’d long hair in my eyes. End of

 

sorry Woodrow didn’t commit a foul. He was fouled it was either a goal or a penalty.

 

What questions. I’ve told you why I thought he used the term. You beg to differ. Doesn’t mean I agree to the term no more than I do pi..y
You turned it into an Holocaust issue not him or I.

 

Then insult his hair if you (royal you) must, not a section of people who you associate in your mind with having long hair. Would you call a white (or black as I don't know if Flint is Romany) player an N word if they had dreadlocks and annoyed you and then when called out on it... say 'no, it's fine I called him that because I was insulting his hair and that makes the use of the word perfectly acceptable'?

 

I blame him for the legit goal he ruled out and failing to get a grip of the game.

 

Sanctimonious. Look it up. He didn’t need to explain to me as I saw it as others would have interpreted. The use of the word may be insulting. But look at the posters meaning. You don’t like the word. Say so. Don’t use it how you see fit. To embarrass him over and above necessary.

 

The word is definitely an insult and using it is insulting. Whether or not the poster genuinely used it as a synonym for 'long-haired' (which seems a little more than slightly unlikely) is irrelevant. Using it without malice does not stop it being insulting.

 

Has he said anything about one of the worst refereeing decisions I've ever seen, that occurred in the first half?

 

You're still not understanding. If he doesn't like his hair then he should insult his hair (although actually what he didn't like was his footballing so surely he should just insult that instead). Instead, he has insulted the Romany community. Why bring them into it? Why do they get insulted because there is a footballer with long hair who did something an opposing team didn't like?

 

Thanks for your valuable contribution.

 

The biggest worry is if the ref has admitted this at full time there's 2 scenarios that happened. Either the ref knew his mistake at the time but failed to rectify it or he knew the error but was blatantly ******* cheating. There is no way a ref can admit an error at full time without seeing a replay unless he knows very well what he's done!

 

And he didn't even it up for us either!

 

Or he realised afterwards when he thought about it again following the incident.

 

Gior. where’s tha been for last 30 yrs
And what if you’re wrong.
To accuse someone on a whim is tantamount to slander if wrong. I said. If I’m wrong I’ll stand corrected. I offered another view.