Would you lie without the evidence and given the possible consequences. He appears to have the evidence, If not. Let’s see the fallout. Either way it’s win win for me.
proven liar accuses proven liar of lying - hard to know what to think, The WhattsApp message is pretty damming though unless Cummings has fabricated it - but if he has I would have expected Coko to beging libel proceedings
The whatsapp messages would be very easy to disprove, and it's telling neither DePfeffel or No10 have denied them. Where they have come back are with general broad range rebuffs of "not recognising things" As you say though, 2 proven liars. Neither of which should be close to government. If one who's been rid, helps rid the other... I'm absolutely fine with that.
I just don't believe a single word he is saying tbh. Listening to what he is saying.. So the PM's closest advisor and for years he is saying he continually advised him he was wrong etc.. Just doesn't happen in real life. Either the advisor chalks **** on it, I'm not being listened to or the PM moves him out for the person he is listening to... Nothing adds up with Cummings. Obvs there have been some poor decisions especially initially that the government took but for him to say he was outside all of that is simply rubbish.
Yes years, Boris hasn't exactly been in for decades. But with his opinion of him, why would he do that job and why would he have him. not really rocket science is it..
He knows that what he and the government did was bang out of order. He helped shape those rules, he supported the decisions and he encouraged the blonde one at every step. He did so whilst very carefully keeping any evidence of his involvement off of traceable media whilst simultaneously collecting evidence of the others involvement and he did it because he knew that his and their behaviour was abhorrent and he was giving himself an out. An out that he's now making use of. The blonde one knows full well that c.nutings was lying through his teeth when he took their lass on holiday for her birthday but because he's on record backing his ******** he can't now admit it was a lie and drop Barnard boy in it. That's the only difference between the two of them. One is a devious conniving ***** that tries to cover his tracks, the other is a devious conniving ***** who is too thick to do so. And let's remember that Barnard boy has previous for faking evidence like when he altered his blog to make it look like he had predicted covid when in reality he was merely covering his tracks. He's the most dangerous man in Britain and he's even more dangerous because seemingly he has the political editor of the BBC in his pocket and has for the last few years
Agree yeah.. But Cummings seems to have dug himself a hole now. Saying how happy he was before joining the government under Johnson,only doing it as long as he could shape the agenda... Then says how nobody ever listened to him... He would have resigned, end of story if most of the decisions he wasn't a major part of.
What a load of tosh you might as well as had Johnson himself interviewing Commings, the only thing I got out of this interview was Brexit was built on lies and Johnson is not fit for office but I knew that before the interview and anyone with 1/2 a brain knew that he should have been interview by someone like James O'Brien and not that Tory wannabe.