So who is it who chooses that our throw-ins should be to Woodrow's head?

Is it the manager or the thrower? Because whichever of the two it is is absolutely clueless. In fact regardless of who it is the manager takes the blame because an idiot in the stands realised how ineffective it was weeks ago but the berk in the dugout still thinks it's a good idea. Directly led to their goal yesterday because for reasons unknown Woodrow refuses to jump or challenge for any header and as soon as the ball is thrown in his direction it's possession to them.

So why the **** do we do it?

 

Maybe he doesn't want dementia?

 

Thats ok but then why throw it at his head when an idiot in the stand knows he's going to do everything he can to get his head away from it? It's like a manager instructing the rest of the team to constantly pass the ball to Stephen mcphail's right foot knowing full well he doesn't use it. It's terrible management

 

He forgot that he's a striker months ago ( although second half yesterday was the exception)

 

If you watch the game in full you’ll find Woodrow won a few headers yesterday.

 

Too many times we Chuck throw ins “up the line” - we rarely win the header & thus give away possession. We really need to sort our throws out

 

For years though we've seemed to be shi5e at throwing other than a few spells here and there. Weird

 

It's bad when we're in more danger of conceding from our own throw ins, than we are from our opponents