It will make no difference.. we have too many players that are not up to championship level.. but that is what you will get signing only young players. Back to square one.. some these players will need at least one season at a lower level..
Or maybe the player are good enough, but need some work getting them organized and to play in a coherent system that suits them. Many of us said the same thing at the start of last season, but when VI came in and immediately spotted the players were not of the standard needed to play silky smooth football(not a criticism, there are not many players that are capable of playing that way. Especially in our budget), the results took a huge upturn.
Best start since qpr with players that aren’t good enough? Or having a go despite no tactical awareness from their manager who sat on his hands and did **** all again, apart from make baffling substitutions, and watched four centre halves not be organised enough to defend a cross as we lost another game?
And who is to blame for turning the fittest group of players I think I've ever seen at Oakwell into a team that don't look fit enough in the space of a pre-season? That's why I don't think he should be here come the next game.
We do have Championship players just not playing to their strengths or motivated. Our players have Championship experience now, it's not good enough from all departments.
Hoof ball .. A/ no need to play any kind of football. B/ playing in front of empty grounds so our little darlings had no pressure on em.. I'm not a Schopp fan, looks bang average to me .. but if you your way and he goes. Then whoever comes in will have to bring four or five decent players with em. We've been let down and sold a pup by Conway again.. That is the main problem here. Ferking higher up than Schopp