Problems started at Nice their fans wanted them out then went to Nancy who appointed Gauthier then Stendel drive wage bills down and the age of the squad down Similar to Oostende sell a player good money and that’s it The trend in the clubs are all familiar
Well, I enjoyed the video. Rome is burning at the minute and some of the opinions and language are reflective of that.
What doesn't take long? Because I have a different view to you? I have the views I do. I also spend hours looking through articles listening to people's opinions that are more educated on things like this than you or I on a monthly basis. I don't just say things I look and educate myself on things first. If I complain about x then that will be after spending 10 hours at least going through and looking at what others do in football.
Well then you'd know full well that our owners were quick to take credit for things that were in place before they bought the clubs and haven't invested a penny in any of their clubs. Fair enough to have a different view but it's no more educated than anyone else's.
Hemsworth tyke has always been like this. The board was better whilst he was serving his life ban for disgustingly abusing Bobby Hassells wife
You historically assess what the majority view is and then take the polar opposite position on any given topic, however ridiculous that is. Now that's my view, u won't change it by any level of justification and I haven't got the time, effort or inclination to engage in joining you down your childish rabbit hole. A troll disguised as a leopard don't change his spots and a peaceful situation should have been left alone. I think I've only ever had to put 2 people on ignore, the other one ain't back here yet. So, as we were.......
Is there just a possibility that it was actually the other way around, and that the prospects of the club as presented to Lee, Conway et al were never actually achievable without realistic investment?
What you mean like “buy this club lads and lasses ,it runs itself and our academy and recruitment is always producing players you can sell for a few million profit,like panning for gold “,all speculation but you never know
No. Or else they wouldn’t have gone in to purchase all.their other clubs. Us and Nice were the fish to catch all the other clubs with, it's a pyramid scheme.
Just watched the red all over segments and its good to see original.Luke again. I preferred Tykes TV when he and Craig were on it, they were more middle of the road. Tykes TV is too ranty and Red all over a bit too upbeat!
I also disagree with the majority view. I have summarised figures from the latest published accounts and I have used those figures to justify my views. My views are based on my understanding of business finance and Accounts. Does that make me a troll as well? Should I be censored until I am able to recite the general view - parrot fashion? Should all those who disagree with the majority learn to be quiet and say nothing? Or should alternative view points be heard because there might be something there that the majority could learn from? Everyone is disappointed with our performances this season. Everyone is angry and want to take their anger out on something or someone. However, anger is not a sound basis for analysis because it influences the choices for a solution. No-one should make long term decisions whilst they are angry. The football club is at a crossroads and the best way to plot a sound future is to think about things coldly and calmly, and without any pre-existing conclusions about what went wrong and who was at fault. With respect, that really does not matter. What matters now is that the club has a plan for a sound financial future, and that plan has to be supported by budgets and cash forecasts. None of us are in any position to produce such a plan. We are all just throwing ideas about, and in those circumstances, the majority position is unsupported by facts and figures, just as the minority position is.
Exactly that, although perhaps pitched a little more subtly! They certainly seem to have come in with an unrealistic view of what could be done with the land(although I'd argue that was more down to their/their legal advisers' lack of due diligence). Only a suggestion, mind.
The difference is that you often disagree with the majority view because you have a different opinion. Hemsworth tyke disagrees with it just so he can disagree with it. That makes him a troll
I have read what he has written in this thread and his views seem reasonable and well argued. My argument is that if people are forced out of here, their views cannot be read. They are being censored. If you do not respect his view, either ignore it or do not read it. Trying to censor someone's view through personal abuse has always been wrong, and always will be wrong.
Again I'll say that his views are always deliberately trolling. He has a life ban from the BBS but has circumnavigated it by using a new account.
Then you should use reasoned argument to expose him as a troll. Personal abuse is always wrong. It is a way of undermining the reputation of the poster without having to show that his argument is wrong. It is just lazy.
There hasn't been personal abuse. He's a troll who was banned for abusing Bobby Hassells wife so he is called a troll and reminded that he was banned for abusing Bobby Hassells wife. That isn't abusing him
