BFC site monetisation

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by DannyWilsonLovechild, Aug 17, 2022.

  1. Gally

    Gally Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    17,043
    Likes Received:
    12,613
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Of course you did. It must be incorrect, its a personal bias that nobody else sees, after all, you are never wrong. We have already found that out. Hence "the stalker" who you are unhappy with each and every time they point out an error or hole in the argument.
     
    55&counting likes this.
  2. Dan

    DannyWilsonLovechild Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    15,558
    Likes Received:
    19,593
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley
    I'm telling you your bias, your assumption is wrong.

    When I'm wrong, I'll accept it. No problem on that front.

    I'm not unhappy with the person you suggest for pointing out errors, another wrong assumption on your part. Because that's just not the case. If you tolerate the consistent behaviours of said individual, all of which has been outlined for you and which many others have also taken exception to... well that's your choice.

    And if you want to discuss it in more detail, feel free to PM me.
     
  3. Mic

    Michael Noz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2009
    Messages:
    919
    Likes Received:
    675
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The Bristol match. I was surprised to see the 'round the pitch' continuous advertising screens. One of the ads was big on colour and movement and it did drag my eyes away from the match. Trying not to be negative, here. It seems to be well accepted.
    At an international match, a while back, Australia v China, these screens were put around the sidelines and I was seated five rows back. I couldn't see the sideline and about two metres of the pitch.
    I was indignant but laziness and hopelesness kicked in..

    (now there is a question... how do you spell hoplessness, hopelesness hoplesness)
     
  4. ley

    leythtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Messages:
    8,194
    Likes Received:
    12,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I think there's a lot to be said about centralising the production of these things. Every club wants the website to do the same thing, list news articles, sell tickets, sell merchandise, post fixture and squad news etc.. Paying for that functionality to be developed once, rather than 72 or 92 entities paying for their own version of the same thing to be developed seperately has it's obvious benefits. But you have to do it well.

    I personally, don't have a problem with the website, as I don't find the ads particularly intrusive. Compare with something like the Yorkshire Post website, which is pretty much unreadable. As for iFollow, they're really just made a mess of it, both in the quality of it and the sale of the media rights.
     
    55&counting and Loko the Tyke like this.
  5. Redarmy87

    Redarmy87 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2018
    Messages:
    4,917
    Likes Received:
    6,857
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Agree with your points. On the iFollow point, what has happened to it? Jay alluded to it the other week. On Tuesday the camera was so wobbly at times, a man was in front of it taking his seat at least twice; it was generally amateurish. I'm not having a go at the club, and don't want to chastise the cameraman etc, but when you pay a tenner a pop and compare it to Now TV (Sky) for example (£12 for a day pass), it's night and day in terms of quality. Very poor for me now, and i can't recall it being this bad before.
     

Share This Page