Manchester derby

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by troff, Jan 14, 2023.

  1. J...

    J... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It was so loud but the commentators didn’t even comment on it. Sure nobody will have heard.
     
  2. J...

    J... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,116
    Likes Received:
    1,704
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    We would be offside no matter what.
     
  3. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    59,169
    Likes Received:
    25,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Should have been offside and no goal. You shouldn't be allowed to block off the ball from defendeds whilst claiming you're not involved in play, just because you didn't touch it.
     
    North Yorks Red and J... like this.
  4. Sup

    Superhiggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    897
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Said it for years they should do away with offside altogether
     
  5. man

    mansfield_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    10,487
    Likes Received:
    17,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    The game would be much worse if strikers just babbylined.
     
    GeorgeRobledo likes this.
  6. Sup

    Superhiggy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2016
    Messages:
    784
    Likes Received:
    897
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It would never happen
     
  7. man

    mansfield_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    10,487
    Likes Received:
    17,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It would be crap because you'd have defensive lines forced to stray no further than the edge of their 18 yard box. It would kill football.
     
  8. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,480
    Likes Received:
    14,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    yeah right let’s have a striker stood on each goal line! :confused:
     
  9. North Yorks Red

    North Yorks Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    16,480
    Likes Received:
    14,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Harrogate
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Bloody stupid decision, the sooner they go back to the original rule the better!
     
  10. dreamboy3000

    dreamboy3000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    59,169
    Likes Received:
    25,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    DB3K Towers
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    That would be terrible.
     
  11. Sam

    SambaTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    580
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    They have tried to make deciding offside decisions as complicated and methodical as possible, with phases of play and cycles of movement and whatever else they describe it as. The day light rule was good enough. Anything less than daylight was basically onside and everyone was ok with it. People who don't understand the game are trying to make it a complicated technological science when there is no need.
    Rashford couldn't have interfered more without actually scoring himself. He basically performed an emergency stop not to touch the ball. We've seen goals ruled out for a player passively stood offside but nowhere near the ball. Others ruled out for a player's nose been offside. VAR just gives extra ways for inconsistent decisions to be made.
     
  12. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,537
    Likes Received:
    13,471
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    100% this rule was made by someone who has never played football. I'm not suggesting you have to have played pro football to understand or make rules, ofcourse not. But when it's something so unique and detrimental as this new rule, clearly they've naffed up. If Rashford wasn't offside, if he was behind play, that ball get's cleared easily, defender wouldn't have had to run around Rashford for one. It's ridiculous. Same as Salah's goal last week.
     
  13. Mr C

    Mr C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    24,942
    Likes Received:
    15,732
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Saving the world.
    Location:
    Wentworth
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Offside for me. If I had Marcus Rashford running at me with the ball, I’d feel a little bit interfered with..
    Oo-er..:)
     
  14. ley

    leythtyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2019
    Messages:
    8,194
    Likes Received:
    12,127
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    You can basically have someone stood yards offside and play the ball towards him knowing defenders will have to try to get to the offside player because you don’t know if the linesman will flag. Then with a defender out of the picture, a player can run from deep with less defenders on him. Teams tried it against us in the Ismael season.

    But even with the current laws, I’ve no idea how that wasn’t disallowed. He’s virtually shielded the ball for yards then dummied it for fernandes
     
    Farnham_Red likes this.
  15. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,391
    Likes Received:
    23,826
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Just seen it on MOTD. Whoever has rewritten the rule to make Rashford interference not count wants firing. Of course he significantly affected play
    The offside rule has been really screwed up and it hasn’t improved the game
     
  16. winged avenger

    winged avenger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2016
    Messages:
    2,398
    Likes Received:
    3,655
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Perfectly legitimate goal & perfect performance by United & long it continue
     
  17. Wat

    Watcher_Of_The_Skies Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2011
    Messages:
    9,298
    Likes Received:
    5,204
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Leeds
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Ridiculous. Ironically it made the idea of offside redundant as the defender's attempts at doing so proved worthless.

    In my view it's just an attempt to create more goals, because goals = higher viewing figures. Nothing to do sanctity of the game itself.
     
  18. Micky Finn

    Micky Finn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2005
    Messages:
    16,305
    Likes Received:
    13,092
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    Light bender
    Location:
    It depends who's asking...
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It was aimed at Kalvin Phillips, who was warming up on the touchline. Relating to his supposed weight problem. Not sure if that makes it right though....
     
  19. lk3

    lk311 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2016
    Messages:
    9,564
    Likes Received:
    7,777
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Ah right, game was on in background, I heard it and looked up but couldn’t see anything.
     

Share This Page