New EFL Sky Sports deal

Discussion in 'Bulletin Board' started by DazFrumTarn, May 5, 2023.

  1. DazFrumTarn

    DazFrumTarn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,396
    Likes Received:
    2,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Tarn
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
  2. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I don't blame sky one bit as they are simply buying a product offered for sale by the EFL under instruction from the clubs but I think it's a horrible deal. More money thrown at an industry which doesn't need it and what does it actually mean for the fans? More disruption to fixture dates.
     
    GloucesterRedsBigBro likes this.
  3. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Don't think this is true. Clubs like Bury who've gone out of business definitely needed it. Don't like it, but the more money going into league 1 & 2 the better imo bud.
     
    wombwell-red likes this.
  4. Exi

    Exile Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2007
    Messages:
    5,813
    Likes Received:
    6,717
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley
    So, if I'm reading that right, on average, there's a 5 in 24 chance in L1 that any Saturday 3pm game of ours will get moved (assuming parity of coverage between L1 and L2 and between clubs which, in practice, may not be the case) and if we are fortunate enough to be promoted to the Championship it's a 5 in 12 chance? Any extra money will just go into player salaries and/or attract more unsavoury wild-west style financial gambler owners. Horrific. Whither the fans views?
     
  5. red

    redrum Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    25,368
    Likes Received:
    18,695
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)

    I agree with the 2nd bit but Bury would still be in the football league had they not been run awfully and borrowed on the ground etc.
     
  6. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yes you are right bud. Poor example given how they were run. But yes my point was to try close the gap between league 1 & 2 and those higher up. When clubs can spend 20/30 million on players in championship whilst getting parachute payments, something wrong has happened!
     
  7. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I disagree. Using their current unsustainable spending models where they pay bang average footballers a millionaires wage they need it but in reality they really really don't. They only want it because they offer ridiculous wages
     
  8. Gally

    Gally Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    12,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    [​IMG]



    Is this also saying ifollow streaming will be replaced by sky at least if you are in the UK?
     
  9. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    So what's the alternative for them not offering competitive wages though? Just slowly drift down the leagues? Over the years I've hated watching us lose our best players all the time. Not saying they still won't leave, but perhaps we'll have a better chance of retaining them, or putting more money into scouting. Anything. I'd be all for restricting spending of premier league & championship clubs, just won't happen, ever
     
  10. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Exactly what you suggest. More restrictions and a tighter control of finances with penalties for clubs overspending. It's the only way. Throwing more and more money at the problem won't solve it. All it means is that the premier League will demand more money to maintain the gap and the spiral will continue all being funded by football fans both via TV subscriptions and on the gate.
     
  11. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    upload_2023-5-5_19-17-43.png

    Don't think so Gally. 'will remain for audio-visual arrangements for international audiences' I assume they probably mean on weekdays when folk don't need to use a VPN
     
  12. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It's the opposite isn't it? Instead of getting midweek matches via red button included in your subscription you'll now have to pay a tenner a time to watch them on ifollow?
     
    Farnham_Red likes this.
  13. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It just won't happen though. No way will they sacrifice money at the very type, whether than's Fifa, FA, Sky, Premier league clubs, any of them. The fact 'big' clubs like Derby, Reading & Wigan etc get away time & time again with financial overspending, yet nothing happens other than points deductions, nothing will change. If you're a smaller club though like Bury, Macclesfield, then ciao
     
  14. Tyke The Tree-Frog

    Tyke The Tree-Frog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Messages:
    10,534
    Likes Received:
    13,468
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    It says replace so I don't think so bud. I might be reading it wrong however
     
  15. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    I know they won't but that doesn't make this deal good. It means that we as fans have to pay more to watch it on TV, will see smaller attendances AND will have to suffer more fixture changes. All so clubs can pay more wages and obscene transfer fees? Regardless of whether they feel they have to do that or not is irrelevant for me, if they want to the the owners can get their hands in their pockets instead of the fans
     
    Exile likes this.
  16. SuperTyke

    SuperTyke Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    55,300
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    Yeah isn't that what replace means though? Streamed matches replace red button. Streamed matches cost a tenner, red button doesn't.

    It's a terribly written piece though that isn't clear at all
     
  17. Gally

    Gally Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    17,039
    Likes Received:
    12,611
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    York
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Well i have an aversion to paying money to sky so I wouldnt have it included but it sounds like Id have to pay them rather than BFC via IFollow once it comes in. Or just use a vpn I guess all the time.
     
    SuperTyke likes this.
  18. Dep

    Deputy Dawg Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2017
    Messages:
    612
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Gender:
    Male
    Style:
    Barnsley (full width)
    DAZN bid for the rights was to show every one of the EFL matches live including 3pm Saturday kick offs.
    the live streaming of Saturday 3pm kick offs was an option for broadcasters to use in there bids.
    1656 matches live worldwide including the U.K
     
  19. pompey_red

    pompey_red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,539
    Likes Received:
    9,582
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fareham
    Home Page:
    Style:
    Barnsley Dark
    that’s what I understand, the big noise is extra tv cash up front, the details are clubs not getting I follow money anymore and all matches available via the sky streaming app, sat 3pm matched streamed for oversees subscribers / VPN only
     
  20. Farnham_Red

    Farnham_Red Administrator Staff Member Admin

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    34,390
    Likes Received:
    23,824
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Farnham
    Style:
    Barnsley
    Looks like if the club is to get money it’s a VPN like on a Saturday afternoon. But I guess we need to see the details
     

Share This Page