My first thought was could it be Barry Spinnaker (Lineker!). I thought ohh no what has the crisp muncher maybe said this time.
I fear it is going to be another scandal like Philip Schofield where homophobes have a bit of an excuse. The fact that they have been careful to not reveal the teen's gender suggests I might be right in my opinion.
Anyone on social media bandying names around should stop immediately. If the wrong person sees it they would definitely be sued
Gary Lineker, Jeremy Vine and another no mark have tweeted NO ME. I’m sure others will disassociate themselves from this. Tbh BBC should be shut down. Nothing but a haven for perverts who receive protection. I’m struggling to think of who it can be.
Those photos must have been good for 35 grand. I wouldn't pay that for a Margot Robbie mud wrestling video.
I think this is another where the reporting has been a bit sensationalised. It isn't a case of £35k for a photo or a set of photos, it's 35,000 allegedly spread over a period of 3 years which is a lot of money but remember that there are women on only fans making that weekly. Yes weekly.
The wording of the claims by the mother also suggests it's a male and I too suspect that homophobia is playing a part, especially with some of the na!es people are openly naming and accusing.
Not from one bloke though? I wouldn't pay £35,000 for a set of Margot Robbie mud wrestling videos over a period of three years. My ceiling is £25k
A site where people, predominantly women, can post explicit photos and videos and do explicit live streams in exchange for a subscription fee from 'customers'. So for example there's a lass called Rebecca Goodwin who used to use food stamps to feed her kids. She then started an only fans account charging about a tenner a month and has around 10,000 men subscribing giving her an income of well over a million a year.
Not wanting to down play the offence that's been committed here at all, but I find it quite ironic The Sun's outrage on this when they had a 16-year-old Sam Fox posing on page 3 and did a daily countdown until Charlotte Church was "legal" (amongst plenty of other stuff).
My first thought was it sounded like blackmail tbh, pay for one and then pay to keep it quiet kind of scenario but I'm sure it will all come out in the the wash.
I'm too tight for all that. I only know much about it because I know a couple of women who have it (yeah I know, I'm surprised that I know women too)
No surprise that the name of one of the main supposed suspects from this certain “news”papers “news” story is a person that the BBC haters have been out to get all year, for no other reason than them having a different opinion to the haters and voicing it. I predicted the name to my wife as soon as the rumour mongers started up & I wasn’t surprised to see it, as it fits the usual unfair bashing of that particular person. It’s almost like the anti-BBC agenda of certain privately owned news outlets is furthered better, when they don’t actually have to name someone specifically.